The Groom The bride and The Wedding

Hello Sergev:

I went back and reread your pitch and your book and did find that you have made significant improvements in communicating to the reader what it is that you have set out to do.

Given that greater understanding, I was definitely better able to appreciate the tremendous work which you have put into this book. We are all unique individuals; and as such, God the Father has a way of communicating His love to us in ways that He does with no other. In your case, I get the sense that He has used these anagrams to reveal to you, on numerous levels, how much He treasures you as His son. As the readers read your book, he or she likewise has the opportunity to reach out and grab the same identify of sonship/daughtership for themselves. Thus, this goes beyond being a merely personalized revelation to one that blesses many, many people. In this sense, your book has a tremendous devotional quality which edifies the reader and draws him or her into deeper, intimate relationship with God.

Blessings to you as you continue to polish this book.

James Revoir

Sergev,
Thank you for inviting me to read The Groom the Bride and the Wedding.
What an incredibly original idea for a novel, anagrams and the Bible. I read the first two chapters of your book and I commend you on your writing, your patience and above all, your faith. This is certainly an interesting concept that i haven't encountered before and i wish you luck with it :).
Maria
Dark of the Moon

Hello Sergev---
book-------------' the groom the bride and the wedding'..

This is a most original book, have not come across anything like it before.

the concept of anagrams and finding one's way to God , certainly will keep the mind ticking over.
It certainly is a new approach to spreading the Catholic church message.

Of course, i believe that anything and everything in this world is possible and nothing is impossible.

You have left me with a teaser --' what is my anagram'?????????

you have done well in writing this in a different language to your own, and i have no doubt that it will be
of great interest to many, and open to discussion.

wish you good luck with it .

tom bye dublin ireland.
from hugs to kisses'
please oblige and glance at mine, it's about a boy growing up in deprived conditions, as it was in dublin in the 40s

Dear Rev. Moreno: This is a beautiful, beautiful book with a unique and fascinating theme. I know that you are extraordinarily bright and talented because of the insight and depth of your work. Your knowledge of the Bible is very impressive and your faith and love for the Lord is evident in your work. I think you have done a wonderful job of looking at anagrams in a new and spiritual way!

Is Tagalog your first language? I ask because, although I can see that you are an extremely intelligent man, your writing contains a lot of second-language mishaps which interfere with the reader's appreciation of your work. Let me give you some examples from the first chapter only:

"shall respond to revere you" should be "shall respond by revering you"

"revel" should be "rejoice"

"...I'm sure many of you knew her more than i do..." should be "...I'm sure many of you know more about her than I do"

"...to conception as a personal..." should be "to conception through a personal"

"compiled, deciphered, and reflected." should be "compiled, deciphered, and reflected upon."

"this collection of anagrams have theological..." should be "this collection of anagrams has theological..."

"...God written on the bible" should be "God written in the Bible..."

"...the Lord manifested by serving..." should be "...the Lord which is manifested in serving..."

"...concept of glorification by faith..." should be "concept of glorification through faith..."

"...enough introductions..." should be "...enough introduction..."

"...in decoding true meaning...." should be "...in decoding the true meaning..."

These errors continue through the rest of your chapters and so I would strongly urge you to either send your work to an editorial service or to find someone whose first language is English to edit your manuscript.

I want to strongly encourage you to keep writing! God has given you a message and the gift of expressing that message in new and unique ways. Don't give up just because there are some language barriers. You can overcome them! There is a lot of fresh appeal and inspiring, uplifting new ideas expressed in your book. Your writing embodies joy and hope and faith and I'm certain that God has called you to write and will eventually have your books published. But first there must be some editing of your work. So, I wish you the very best as you edit, or have a professional service edit, your book. Prayers and hope for publication.

Hello Sergev,

You have written a fascinating book here with an unusal and interesting concept of the anagrams contained in the words The Groom The Bride and The wedding.
It shows that you have either an intuitive or conscious understanding of the Bible itself because messages like this were deliberately hidden in the texts. This was for many reasons such as finding ever-deeper levels of meaning which is the central plank of your book. I love the way that each concept hangs together with the others and how you have developed the themes towards the salvation that is expressed in both the Bible and your initial set of words.
Very well done. Kindest regards, Steve

this is really a hard to grasp piece for it tries to portray a new persona beyond my personal being.... these anagrams were cryptic messages but when i tried to patch and stitched each other, a great mystery revealed....

and this would lead to the proclaimation of the decree of the Lord--- to glorify and to govern...

anyways thank you for commenting on it...

Hi Sergev

I'm not sure what to make of this. Your pitch, to me, is quite confusing and I'm not sure what you're aiming for with this book? I personally don't think it's something that will get to the mainstream. At it's heart it may be a theological story but it's part auto-biographical and it's focussed around your name as anagrams? I have to say I'm really confused by it. I am a religious person, but at the same time I found this to be quite heavy - it felt as though I was being preached at at times, though maybe that's because I hate to feel lectured in the real world. I must say, it takes guts to write something like this. You're opening yourself up in such a way that I can only imagine will have lead to ridicule (thinking about the messiah bits here) so I have to congratulate you on uploading it - as well as the fact that English isn't your mother tongue. But personally, this isn't a book I can relate to. I like escapism and this didn't provide it for me.

Good luck

Silva
Heart Shaped Bruise

The concept is really clever, but I have to admit I wouldn't read on further, for at least two reasons. (1) I don't understand where you plan to go with this, and (2) it seems like another playing with biblical stuff in a way that I have a hard time accepting. Is it going to morph into being a novel?

this is truly a wise observation....
honestly, i was diagnosed with bipolar personality disorder which means i have two modes of behavior.there were times when i'm on extreme manic and also on extreme depressive.... and definitely this work of art was written during those two modes....
i'm very much glad you have noticed those personality of me in this writing...

on ruling with iron rod: is n't it Christ who once said that those who does not want him to be a king shall be slain in his presence... on How it will be done, in revelation he was described as a son of man having a sword of fire coming out from his mouth....

lastly, i mention matthew xxiv as an external quality so there must have an internal description of christ's second coming..... it is said in revelation: he has a name known to noone but himself. 2. his name is the word of God.... and a name written in his wrist "king of kings and lord of lords".
so, 1. His name presents his true identity.... nobody know it but himself.
2. if the 7th anagram is the word of God is follows that this name is word of God
3. as king of Kings he bears the messianic decree of the king: to Govern... and as the LOrd of LOrds, He shall bear the messianic decree as the lord: to Glorify...

with this, let me thank you from the bottom of my heart about your sincere opinion to this book.... everything you said will be taken not for granted...may you'll be bless throughout your life.... cheers for this..
sergev

Hi Sergev, As you say in your CLOSING MESSAGE:

`As to the authenticity whether it is divinely inspired or just a fruit of my imagination, I said once again that I am not in a position to determine it.'

This is a very important thing that you have said. It means that you are still open-minded on the question: is Sergev Roy L. Moreno the Divine Son? Naturally, one side of you wants to be the Divine Son. But another side of you knows this: if you chase after a figment of your imagination, then nothing good can result for Sergev.

Psalm 2 says the Son will rule the world with a rod of iron. If you were to hit people on their heads with a rod of iron, because they rejected you as the Messiah, then, what would happen? Would you rule the world? Or would you be arrested? Would you be sent to prison or to an insane asylum? Would your wife leave you? Would you inflict pain on her because of your actions?


You write, `And lastly, I now feel relieved that I have written my ideas about it. It sounds ridiculous and irrational but that is the dictate of my heart.'

Again, a part of you says it is ridiculous to think you are the Divine Son, but your heart wants it to be true.

Your book ought to state right at the beginning what it is you believe. The Christians here at authonomy want you to say: `I am not the Divine Son, I am not God, but this the story of how I came to believe that I was God...'

I think you have an important book, but this book has to be the story about how you were led into error, about how you were led to believe you were the Divine Son mentioned in Psalm ii. I suspect you don't want to hear that you have been chasing after a figment of your imagination, but, you must ask yourself: will you go to jail, will you ruin your life, will you inflict pain on your family, if you take a rod of iron and assault people who reject you as the Son mentioned in Psalm 2?

Don't despair. People will want to read your autobiography. And as I said before, you are quite brave, and it is a very interesting autobiography - Bill

Hi Sergev, As you say in your CLOSING MESSAGE:

`As to the authenticity whether it is divinely inspired or just a fruit of my imagination, I said once again that I am not in a position to determine it.'

This is a very important thing that you have said. It means that you are still open-minded on the question: is Sergev Roy L. Moreno the Divine Son? Naturally, one side of you wants to be the Divine Son. But another side of you knows this: if you chase after a figment of your imagination, then nothing good can result for Sergev.

Psalm 2 says the Son will rule the world with a rod of iron. If you were to hit people on their heads with a rod of iron, because they rejected you as the Messiah, then, what would happen? Would you rule the world? Or would you be arrested? Would you be sent to prison or to an insane asylum? Would your wife leave you? Would you inflict pain on her because of your actions?


You write, `And lastly, I now feel relieved that I have written my ideas about it. It sounds ridiculous and irrational but that is the dictate of my heart.'

Again, a part of you says it is ridiculous to think you are the Divine Son, but your heart wants it to be true.

Your book ought to state right at the beginning what it is you believe. The Christians here at authonomy want you to say: `I am not the Divine Son, I am not God, but this the story of how I came to believe that I was God...'

I think you have an important book, but this book has to be the story about how you were led into error, about how you were led to believe you were the Divine Son mentioned in Psalm ii. I suspect you don't want to hear that you have been chasing after a figment of your imagination, but, you must ask yourself: will you go to jail, will you ruin your life, will you inflict pain on your family, if you take a rod of iron and assault people who reject you as the Son mentioned in Psalm 2?

Don't despair. People will want to read your autobiography. And as I said before, you are quite brave, and it is a very interesting autobiography - Bill

Hi Sergev, In Anagram 7 GOVERN ROME SORELY - Chapter 9 in Authonomy's system - You are more or less clear in stating that you are the anointed, the Son mentioned in Pslam 2. You write at the end of Chapter 9, `So as I, also, was named Sergev Roy L. Moreno and I SHALL GOVERN ROME SORELY in fulfilment of god's plan for His Kingdom. And so, this is the call from God and this is my mission.'

You mention in the third to the last paragraph some thoughts you have about people accusing you of not being qualified. And you mention the antichrist, the son of perdition, and that people will accuse you of being this malevolent person. You mention that you have a less than impressive record in life, thus people will doubt you.

What you have, for evidence, that you are God, that is, God the Son, is 1) you're brave to proclaim to the world that you are the Messiah. It takes guts to do that, and, 2) you have some interesting words that you can create by rearranging the letters in your name, and you received your name in an unusual way. Unfortunately, the theology behind anagrams relies much more on `The Da Vinci Code' than the Bible.

You are convinced that you are right. Therefore, you will become more and more frustrated - frustrated that you are not fulfilling your mission - when the only people you meet are people who reject you as the Messiah. This frustration will lead to actions such as running naked down a freeway, which is a cry for attention. There are people with novels here at autonomy which are pretty good, but, the only way that these novels would ever make money for publishers is if the authors pulled some wild publicity stunts, such as by riding naked on a horse around Liverpool or New York City.

But people are rejecting you for Biblical reasons. No one cares that your record at work wasn't so great. No one cares that you got a little frustrated and ran naked down the street. People do not accept you as the Messiah because you did not arrive on earth as the lightning which shoots from east to west, recall Matthew xxiv. 27.

If you can't accept this, if you continue to insist that you are the Messiah, if you are 100% committed to the belief that you are the Divine Son or Psalm ii, then, this worries people for two reasons, 1) it is a very serious sin to proclaim yourself to be God the Son, someone who must be worshipped, and 2) people fear that you will become frustrated when you see that no one is accepting you as the Messiah, and this rejection will lead to great frustration for you, frustration which might lead you to do something to harm yourself or someone else.

We know it takes bravery to do what you have done. But bravery is not everything! If you deal with your frustration, frustration in not making converts, in an unwise manner, you could hurt yourself or others. And if you did make converts, you will make enemies with God - because you are not the Messiah, and you have fallen into a sin which leads straight to perdition. Sergev, you are not the Messiah. This opinion is nothing personal against you. I will simply not accept anyone as the Messiah unless that person fulfills Matthew xxiv. 27. The anagrams with your name are interesting, but they are not powerful evidence! Powerful evidence is arriving on earth as the lightning which shoots from east to west.

If you continue to insist you are the Messiah, then, if this was true, you would accomplish your mission. But will you get frustrated if you see that you are not accomplishing your mission?

What happens when you get frustrated?

If you could understand that the Messiah MUST arrive on earth in the manner described in Matthew xxiv. 27, and understand that you did not arrive on earth in this manner, then, you could save yourself a lot of frustration and anguish. All the best, Bill

P. S. in your comment to my first comment, you dismiss Matthew xxiv 27 as `symbolical.' You also seem to be refering to Revelation ii. 26-28, which I think pertains to Michael, recall Daniel xii. 1.

wow, thank you once again sir bill. this is the kind of comment that i was really looking for..... let me have again my simple reply:
1. first and for most in my pitch i have stated that these set of anagrams were my only evidence of the claim that i was indeed called by God... (as what i thought when i get insane)... by the way I got insane in the year 2002 and these set of anagrams were discovered on 2006....
2. on frustration: on my reflective summary, i said as to how this plan be carried out is still a mystery to me considering my human capability... and also, at the outset i have already admitted that i'm just an ordinary man with no extra ordinary power to prove myself...(i even have hard time in formulating good english grammar) and i have already accepted that reality.... but still i put all this things in the hand of the father who planned all these things....
3. on matthew xxiv, actually we can generate varied interpretation for this.... for instance, at this moment i was writing my message to you here in the philippines (the only christian nation in the Far east) and now you are reading this message in USA which we called western world.... so, in my opinion can be a possible interpretation to that passage..... and also, that scenario is external quality.... remember jews over-expectation that they tend to fail to recognize their messiah... they expect a hero-king but jesus came as a servant....

Hi Sergev, In Anagram 7 GOVERN ROME SORELY - Chapter 9 in Authonomy's system - You are more or less clear in stating that you are the anointed, the Son mentioned in Pslam 2. You write at the end of Chapter 9, `So as I, also, was named Sergev Roy L. Moreno and I SHALL GOVERN ROME SORELY in fulfilment of god's plan for His Kingdom. And so, this is the call from God and this is my mission.'

You mention in the third to the last paragraph some thoughts you have about people accusing you of not being qualified. And you mention the antichrist, the son of perdition, and that people will accuse you of being this malevolent person. You mention that you have a less than impressive record in life, thus people will doubt you.

What you have, for evidence, that you are God, that is, God the Son, is 1) you're brave to proclaim to the world that you are the Messiah. It takes guts to do that, and, 2) you have some interesting words that you can create by rearranging the letters in your name, and you received your name in an unusual way. Unfortunately, the theology behind anagrams relies much more on `The Da Vinci Code' than the Bible.

You are convinced that you are right. Therefore, you will become more and more frustrated - frustrated that you are not fulfilling your mission - when the only people you meet are people who reject you as the Messiah. This frustration will lead to actions such as running naked down a freeway, which is a cry for attention. There are people with novels here at autonomy which are pretty good, but, the only way that these novels would ever make money for publishers is if the authors pulled some wild publicity stunts, such as by riding naked on a horse around Liverpool or New York City.

But people are rejecting you for Biblical reasons. No one cares that your record at work wasn't so great. No one cares that you got a little frustrated and ran naked down the street. People do not accept you as the Messiah because you did not arrive on earth as the lightning which shoots from east to west, recall Matthew xxiv. 27.

If you can't accept this, if you continue to insist that you are the Messiah, if you are 100% committed to the belief that you are the Divine Son or Psalm ii, then, this worries people for two reasons, 1) it is a very serious sin to proclaim yourself to be God the Son, someone who must be worshipped, and 2) people fear that you will become frustrated when you see that no one is accepting you as the Messiah, and this rejection will lead to great frustration for you, frustration which might lead you to do something to harm yourself or someone else.

We know it takes bravery to do what you have done. But bravery is not everything! If you deal with your frustration, frustration in not making converts, in an unwise manner, you could hurt yourself or others. And if you did make converts, you will make enemies with God - because you are not the Messiah, and you have fallen into a sin which leads straight to perdition. Sergev, you are not the Messiah. This opinion is nothing personal against you. I will simply not accept anyone as the Messiah unless that person fulfills Matthew xxiv. 27. The anagrams with your name are interesting, but they are not powerful evidence! Powerful evidence is arriving on earth as the lightning which shoots from east to west.

If you continue to insist you are the Messiah, then, if this was true, you would accomplish your mission. But will you get frustrated if you see that you are not accomplishing your mission?

What happens when you get frustrated?

If you could understand that the Messiah MUST arrive on earth in the manner described in Matthew xxiv. 27, and understand that you did not arrive on earth in this manner, then, you could save yourself a lot of frustration and anguish. All the best, Bill

P. S. in your comment to my first comment, you dismiss Matthew xxiv 27 as `symbolical.' You also seem to be refering to Revelation ii. 26-28, which I think pertains to Michael, recall Daniel xii. 1.

Hi Sergev,

When you say, in Chapter 2, that you were touched when your father paid you a compliment, this is good solid writing which appeals to our sentimental natures. GLORY OVER MERE SON is not coherent in English because of the word MERE. The Son is not `merely' the Son. The word `mere' incidentally means `mother' in French, so if you had an `&' in your name you would have something that meant Glory Over Mary & Jesus. The part about Ernie, Gurnie and Dionie is interesting and charming. Now the part about the rehab and the insanity, and the part about the son being you, which we read at the end of Chapter 2, will cause Christians to sit up. You have to remember that the scriptures are very clear how the Son will arrive on earth - recall Matthew xxiv. 27 - `for as the lightning comes from the east and flashes to the west, so will be the coming of the Son of Man be.' Therefore if a person has not arrived on earth in this remarkable fashion, he can not be the Divine Son. Of course you will have more readers if you say that you are the Messiah. People will mock you, but they will also read you. If you're saying the Church is the Bride, and that Sergev is the groom - the Son- then this is course more interesting than if you were to say that you are just another guy, e pluribus unam. Let's go on to Chapter 3. Is Sergev the Messiah? A big stumbling block is the fact that you didn't arrive on earth as the lightning which shoots from east to west. If you had done that, then, we would overlook your shortcomings, which you describe at the end of Chapter 3. Now I grant you it is interesting that your name can be arranged into the anagram SERVE RELY ON GROOM. And I concede that it is interesting how your father, Ernie, named you Sergev Roy L Moreno - I mean the part about the Russian sailor and mistaking the words on your infant wrist `boy' for `Roy.' I never saw or read `The Da Vinci Code' but i read about it - and of course red flags go up whenever Christians hear about people learning their theology from those sorts of books / movies. If I'm not reading you right then please correct me! But, you call yourself `the groom,' and you certainly seem to be dropping hints that you consider yourself to be the Messiah, the Divine Son. You have to choose between three directions: 1) you can be more bold in declaring yourself the Messiah, 2) you can drop hints, but not come right out and say that you are the Divine Son, or 3) you can be clear in stating that you are not the Divine Son. 77 days ago Kenneth Edward Lim asked you two very important questions. Please think about Matthew xxiv. 27. Good Luck to you, Bill

thanks bill for a straight to the point comment.... i don't know if i can address all of your raised point but here's my simple reply.
1. MERE-for my own understanding means "ordinary or just"... mere son must be me because I'm just and ordinary son of man having no extra ordinary power unlike the Son of God.
2.i cannot comment on the interpretation on Matthew xxiv 27because for me it is more of a symbolical statement of christ.... however in revelation it also tells that a child be BORN who is destined to rule the world in an iron rod. to rule in iron rod in revelation is the same statement of God towards his son in Psalm 2 saying YOU shall rule them in Iron rod.
3. on my insanity: in part two particularly anagram 6, i consider my insanity as a guilt offering to God. If Jesus was died and hang on the cross to take away the sins of the world, so as I run naked on the road for insanity to remove that guilt forever.... which is the completion of God's plan of salvation.

Hi Sergev,

When you say, in Chapter 2, that you were touched when your father paid you a compliment, this is good solid writing which appeals to our sentimental natures. GLORY OVER MERE SON is not coherent in English because of the word MERE. The Son is not `merely' the Son. The word `mere' incidentally means `mother' in French, so if you had an `&' in your name you would have something that meant Glory Over Mary & Jesus. The part about Ernie, Gurnie and Dionie is interesting and charming. Now the part about the rehab and the insanity, and the part about the son being you, which we read at the end of Chapter 2, will cause Christians to sit up. You have to remember that the scriptures are very clear how the Son will arrive on earth - recall Matthew xxiv. 27 - `for as the lightning comes from the east and flashes to the west, so will be the coming of the Son of Man be.' Therefore if a person has not arrived on earth in this remarkable fashion, he can not be the Divine Son. Of course you will have more readers if you say that you are the Messiah. People will mock you, but they will also read you. If you're saying the Church is the Bride, and that Sergev is the groom - the Son- then this is course more interesting than if you were to say that you are just another guy, e pluribus unam. Let's go on to Chapter 3. Is Sergev the Messiah? A big stumbling block is the fact that you didn't arrive on earth as the lightning which shoots from east to west. If you had done that, then, we would overlook your shortcomings, which you describe at the end of Chapter 3. Now I grant you it is interesting that your name can be arranged into the anagram SERVE RELY ON GROOM. And I concede that it is interesting how your father, Ernie, named you Sergev Roy L Moreno - I mean the part about the Russian sailor and mistaking the words on your infant wrist `boy' for `Roy.' I never saw or read `The Da Vinci Code' but i read about it - and of course red flags go up whenever Christians hear about people learning their theology from those sorts of books / movies. If I'm not reading you right then please correct me! But, you call yourself `the groom,' and you certainly seem to be dropping hints that you consider yourself to be the Messiah, the Divine Son. You have to choose between three directions: 1) you can be more bold in declaring yourself the Messiah, 2) you can drop hints, but not come right out and say that you are the Divine Son, or 3) you can be clear in stating that you are not the Divine Son. 77 days ago Kenneth Edward Lim asked you two very important questions. Please think about Matthew xxiv. 27. Good Luck to you, Bill

Chapters 6 to8. It was interesting to read of your life, and how The Da Vinci Code lead to you experimenting with anagrams.

edit for 1ST paagraph chap 5
I would rewrite thus:
I never thought of the romantic love story of the reunion between lovers, who had been separated by distance for many years. I never pictured the happy ending of long lost lovers meeting again after so many things have happened between them....
Paragraph 3 routine actions.

I will try to look at other chapters this evening

Chapter five has a real sense of joy, even to those who might not share your beliefs. I would change the last sentence to - The next part is about the bride of the Lord : the church. [I assume you mean the bride is the congregation of the church?] The first paragraph needs some rewriting. I will have to work out to say on paper first, but will get back to you when I have.

This is certainly an extremely unique manuscript and one that I'm sure you've put a tremendous amount of time and effort into. Your faith is commendable, and I wish you all the best of blessings in your book and your walk with God.

God bless,

Nathan Maki - A War Within

Hello Sergev:

I went back and reread your pitch and your book and did find that you have made significant improvements in communicating to the reader what it is that you have set out to do.

Given that greater understanding, I was definitely better able to appreciate the tremendous work which you have put into this book. We are all unique individuals; and as such, God the Father has a way of communicating His love to us in ways that He does with no other. In your case, I get the sense that He has used these anagrams to reveal to you, on numerous levels, how much He treasures you as His son. As the readers read your book, he or she likewise has the opportunity to reach out and grab the same identify of sonship/daughtership for themselves. Thus, this goes beyond being a merely personalized revelation to one that blesses many, many people. In this sense, your book has a tremendous devotional quality which edifies the reader and draws him or her into deeper, intimate relationship with God.

Blessings to you as you continue to polish this book.

James Revoir

You need help.

the pitch sounds great... i will definitely take a look
regards
happy writing
dr amit
pls do find some time to review my book.

very interesting- a must read...a book that one cannot read a take it all in via a computer scream. your writing is clear for this type of book- so you have done a grand job there...l shall back this book, and give you six stars for such an epic effort...
read SEASONS...

bai, nice kaau!!!! to God be the Glory

Well your explanations of anagrams of your name is just so enthusiastic. It brings your reader nearer to the bible and encourages him/her to search for her own name meaning. Your writing comes from your heart and is written in first person therefore it keeps your reader focused. Fully rated.
Good luck.
Daniela (place your thoughts on Water Goblin)

its a nicely written...well grasping story... i am sorry but i stay away from religious content as they are very controversial subjects...but overall its good :-)

Sergev,
Thank you for inviting me to read The Groom the Bride and the Wedding.
What an incredibly original idea for a novel, anagrams and the Bible. I read the first two chapters of your book and I commend you on your writing, your patience and above all, your faith. This is certainly an interesting concept that i haven't encountered before and i wish you luck with it :).
Maria
Dark of the Moon

Sergev,
Your work is certainly intriguing and the fact that you are able to produce it in the middle of your personal hardships is a feat in itself. It might be a good idea to define what an anagram is right at the onset, the origin of the word, its uses in prophecy or fortune-telling. Also, since you have the book centered on your name, is your name a message about Christ and you the messenger? Or are you the Son your name implies? Very thought-provoking.

Kenneth Edward Lim
The North Korean

Sergev,

We are brothers in Christ, and I thank God that you are eager to glorify him in your own unique way. Everyone is different and special in God's eyes. We must all love one another in truth, and because I am bound by the truth in love, I must be honest. The manuscript you have written could not be considered for publication by any professional publishing house because the content and style would not appeal to a mass audience. However, it could be appreciated by your inner circle of family and friends who share your passion, enthusiasm, and life experiences. Reaching out to them counts just as much in God's eyes as writing a bestseller, which few of us on this site are likely to do.

I wish you the best, and may God bless you and your family.

In Christ,

Dr. Olaguer

Hello Sergev---
book-------------' the groom the bride and the wedding'..

This is a most original book, have not come across anything like it before.

the concept of anagrams and finding one's way to God , certainly will keep the mind ticking over.
It certainly is a new approach to spreading the Catholic church message.

Of course, i believe that anything and everything in this world is possible and nothing is impossible.

You have left me with a teaser --' what is my anagram'?????????

you have done well in writing this in a different language to your own, and i have no doubt that it will be
of great interest to many, and open to discussion.

wish you good luck with it .

tom bye dublin ireland.
from hugs to kisses'
please oblige and glance at mine, it's about a boy growing up in deprived conditions, as it was in dublin in the 40s

Dear Peterson,

“Lest he be angry and you perish from the way” – true, the Children of Israel perished in the desert on that account.

“Truly his wisdom of giving this name came from God” – excellent. Just as in Peter confessed in Luke 9:20

“What I mean is if we make an anagram of this name, by rearranging all the letters of SERGEV ROY L. MORENO, we can come up with the phrase GLORY OVER MERE SON” – so bright of you have come up with. Of course God revealed it to just He revealed to Peter in Luke 9:20. But of course is partly your ingenuity as you have pointed out saying, “Generating anagrams is a tedious process that requires creativity and perseverance.”

will read on.

JULIUS B [Destined to Triumph]

Sergev,
I like the anagrams for Florence Nightingale and William Shakespeare. They make the book less about you, as James said in his first comment. Your introduction is excellent. I looked carefully , but could find no faults.
Good luck!
Gillian

thank you gillian for your comment, it really enhance my confidence.
sergev

hello james,

thanks you for your modest comment. it helped me a lot. after i get your message, I immediately change my introduction and do some revision in chapter I. as what you've suggested.. honestly, i'm really find it hard to construct good english sentences. however i doubled my effort to cope with it... i hope you'll continue to mentor me as an aspiring writer.

thanks...
sergev

Hello Sergev:

First of all, let me commend you on your effort in this work. Clearly, English is not your first language and I cannot imagine how long it took you to translate this into a language which is not even remotely related to your own. Clearly, you would be well-advised to seek out a proof-reader whose first language is English, so you can at lease begin to remove the language barriers from your manuscript.

Language issues aside, your pitch was very confusing because many people including myself do not know what an anagram is. I managed to go to Dictionary.com so I am more enlightened on the topic; plus, through the course of your introduction, I was able to figure out where you are going with this book. Still, I think I took more effort to understand than most would be willing do. My suggestion would be to assume a complete ignorance on the part of your reader as to what an anagram is and build from the most basic foundation-beginning with the pitch.

Once I ascertained that you had formed anagrams on the basis of your own name, my next concern (as to the potential appeal and success of this book) was that most readers would tend to disregard the content, not for theological reasons, but simply because the anagrams are based on your own name; that being the case, the content is too personalized to you, the author, and people would naturally ask themselves, "So, what does this have to do with ME?" That may come across as selfish, but it is what it is. I think you may have to find a way to generalize the topic to speak to a wider audience-whether it be anagrams or theology in general.

Keep practicing and keep writing!

James Revoir

gillian
thank you for your comment. rest assured that i'll follow your recommendations. you really are a great mentor.
sergev

Sergev, If you use a computer to write, I suggest looking at the grammar/ spell check after each line of writing. I wish I had!
You leave out full stops, several times, and often don`t capitalize names of people. For example, you have written " moses," rather than "Moses"
Also, from what I understand, Christians use capital letters, in phrases such as " Son of God", or "Him" rather than "him" when referring to God or Jesus. I am not religious myself - but think this will be important to your readers.
I have read the first two chapters, then skipped to 3 and 6. I can`t really comment on the content, because of my own beliefs .

I do however , have comments on two phrases.
I would just write "at the day of your birth" or "on the day you were born" rather than adding , " (meaning birthday)" to the first phrase.

I also think that LOL, at the end of your father`s anecdote sounds too modern, for something that appears to have happened so long ago.

Gillian M.H.

hi Sergev. While looking through the comments, of a fellow member, who has helped me, I saw one about your book THE GROOM, THE BRIDE AND THE WEDDING. I was rather surprised that he said you should explain what an anagram is - I think most people know - even if they can`t work them out... Anyway, that remark aroused my curiosity, and your book is now on my watchlist. I`m rather busy over the next few days, but will try to read a chapter or two.

Hello Sergev:

First of all, let me commend you on your effort in this work. Clearly, English is not your first language and I cannot imagine how long it took you to translate this into a language which is not even remotely related to your own. Clearly, you would be well-advised to seek out a proof-reader whose first language is English, so you can at lease begin to remove the language barriers from your manuscript.

Language issues aside, your pitch was very confusing because many people including myself do not know what an anagram is. I managed to go to Dictionary.com so I am more enlightened on the topic; plus, through the course of your introduction, I was able to figure out where you are going with this book. Still, I think I took more effort to understand than most would be willing do. My suggestion would be to assume a complete ignorance on the part of your reader as to what an anagram is and build from the most basic foundation-beginning with the pitch.

Once I ascertained that you had formed anagrams on the basis of your own name, my next concern (as to the potential appeal and success of this book) was that most readers would tend to disregard the content, not for theological reasons, but simply because the anagrams are based on your own name; that being the case, the content is too personalized to you, the author, and people would naturally ask themselves, "So, what does this have to do with ME?" That may come across as selfish, but it is what it is. I think you may have to find a way to generalize the topic to speak to a wider audience-whether it be anagrams or theology in general.

Keep practicing and keep writing!

James Revoir