Book Jacket

 

rank 132
word count 57213
date submitted 02.10.2011
date updated 22.05.2013
genres: Fiction, Literary Fiction, Historic...
classification: moderate
incomplete

The Spectacle that is Jack Coq and his Amazing Anatomie

Arlequin Pigg

You are in the madhouse. You are in a play in the madhouse. The play is about you.

 

This is the tale of a man who is struck by lightning, loses his identity because of it, is burned bald and blue by it, thrown in gaol as a consequence of it, and ends up in some monstrous carnival in a madhouse about it. That man is Jack. Alas, poor Jack. Even his name is not his own.
Ha!
Imagine that. Imagine this.
Jack speaks in his own vernacular, a mixture of criminal cant as heard in the alleys, and words he makes up. He challenges. He provokes. He kills, so it is said. Not everything he says is true. Not everything that happens is real. And not everyone is his friend.
Jack seeks freedom.
He is haunted by images of storms. He has no memory of a self before an event he does not recall. And that troubles him. Yet, he comes to know himself as he is. Jack comes to understand what it is to be alive.
This, then, is a dark fairy tale about the juxtaposition of life and death when the latter beckons. Life; or death? This is one interpretation of that reality.
Taste it.
Feel it.
Be consumed.

 
rate the book

to rate this book please Register or Login

 

tags

acting, almighty jenkins, death, fools, life, mister finch, old jeff, play, reality, theatre

on 49 watchlists

69 comments

 

To leave comments on this or any book please Register or Login

subscribe to comments for this book
LeaPaperDreams wrote 30 days ago

Oh my jeez! I've briefly brushed the surface of your book and I'm thrilled to have found something to hilariously awkward and wonderful. I'm going to pop the kettle on. I have a long afternoon ahead of me, tucked up on the couch, reading through your book properly.

Lea

groggy blush wrote 35 days ago

Comic writing at its best. I read chapter thirteen at random and had a whale of a time.

carol jefferies wrote 42 days ago

Hi Arelequin,

I was attracted to read your book by the great image you chose.

What well written and original work. There's nothing to equal it upon this site.

High stars,

Carol Jefferies
(The Witch of Fleet Street)
(From a Prince to a Pauper)

Hayley Green wrote 53 days ago

Enchanted and amazed in equal measure. The flow of the writing and its originality are not only striking but totally evocative of time and place.

This does everything for me that a good book does, enthralls, doesn't grate, builds wonderful pictures. Definitely deserves to be published. Let's try hard to get this to Ed's desk - if anything deserves it - this is it.

Sheena Macleod wrote 67 days ago

Read further and continuing to enjoy this imaginative book.
#
Sheena
The Popish Plot

Sheena Macleod wrote 76 days ago

Very original work. Excellently presented. Jack Coq will be read and reread with new aspects emerging each time The literary voice is amazing. To build humour so artfully into the chracters makes for a pleasurable read. What a vivid imagination you have!

You will do well with this.

Backed and high stars.
Sheena
The Popish Plot

Tornbridge wrote 80 days ago

Anthony,
I think this is quite an exceptional book and one of most engaging and original on this site. The delivery of the prose and the dialog is masterful. It took me only a chapter or so to back it and a little more to genuinely love it.
I will report back with more in time but wanted to give you / it a big thumbs up from me.

I really hope this will make it to the ED and get recognised for what it is.

Tornbridge
The Washington Adventure

Andrea Taylor wrote 80 days ago

Genius! I bow to a genius. Love the 16th Century (?) language. Clever, witty, oh so tongue in cheek, but pure art. You have done what is needed; ignored all those who say how a book should be written (which is c...p because the whole point is to stand out from the millions of others books which are c...p) and produced something unique and masterful..
Absolutely top stars, WL and BS soon.
Andrea
The de Amerley Affair
You won't like my book (oh, so normal) but I'd appreciate a return read anyway!

zap wrote 89 days ago

Hi Arlequin,

I read 1-17.

When I read this book three years ago I was struck by its vivid and melancholic imagination and by its delicate use of language. This time I enjoyed the reading even more, as it seemed to have improved in structure and pace. The progression seemed smooth, the characterisations earthy and Jack Coq most loveable in his fully justified delivery of humorous lamentations.

While the beginning chapters seemed polished to a high standard, I got the impression that maybe some of the later chapters could benefit from a little bit of editing and tightening up. Chapter 16 had me somewhat puzzled, whereas 17 was spot-on.

I found your writing style colourful and imaginative, very personal and also very relevant. You're as masterful with your three-word sentences as you are with your paragraph-long artistic constructions. The story contains a pleasurable exposition of certain viewpoints as well as prejudices concerning nakedness and 'cover-up'.
A book that's very thought-provoking on different levels. Backed.

Ame

Fragmented wrote 91 days ago

The strangest book Ive ever read...in a very weird and good way!

I think from the people who understand it, it will be very well received, as a modern day type genius sort of book. For the ones who don't understand it well, meh. Nobody understood catch-22 either. Had to re-read that damned book twice before I 'got' it, and then it quickly became one of my top favorite books ever.

And yours will be the same.

An oddball high 5/6, you lose the extra one because I had to re-read it three times ;-)

Rachel

The Bloodline

Juliet Blaxland wrote 91 days ago

The Spectacle that is Jack Coq and his Amazing Anatomie is a genuinely original and timeless masterpiece. If I were a publisher I would snap it up in a trice, for it is the sort of book which would endear itself to millions of people by the most magical of means: enthusiastic word-of-mouth and random actos of book-giving-generosity over a sustained period of time. It already has something of the mystique of a precious heirloom about it. It would therefore keep on selling and giving pleasure for decades. Somewhat ironically, its quirkiness would be exactly the quality that would make it also very sound business sense, even for those too intellectually impoverished to care about anything on than the £Kerching!-factor. HarperCollins, you have seriously missed a trick here. Perhaps this book is too good for you. It certainly deserves to be published, but by someone who really 'gets' it, and will cherish it. In due course, this seems bound to happen... :)

Lin-C wrote 98 days ago

Ah! I have to give in and put this on my shelf. It's the book that sticks in the mind long after reading. A true gem on the site.

brucerodgers wrote 103 days ago

Have just spent a marvellous afternoon in front of the fire in the company of Jack. There are so many comments below that sum up the majesty of this that I'll resist the urge to gush the same sentiment. Take that as granted.

Instead I'll pose you a challenge - the novel is (I suspect) very deliberately much ado about nothing. Bathos at its best. But do you not think that a character as beguiling as Jack deserves better? The potential is huge. I could see him unwittingly involved in all manner of plots and twists, perhaps some that gradually reveal more of his previous self.

I'll leave the thought with you but I foresee a new icon for the adult, deviant generation who never really got Harry Potter.

Bruce :)

brucerodgers wrote 104 days ago

Just love this. By far the best thing I've seen on Authonomy. I see you've already been published - not surprised. Is that both fiction and non-fiction?

Got to Chapter 6 so far. Will carry on with guilty pleasure.

Have backed, starred and friend requested (which is entirely optional).

Genius...

Bruce :)

Nick Goulding wrote 109 days ago

‘The Spectacle that is Jack Coq and his Amazing Anatomie’
Is this the most unique literary voice here? I believe so. Not the easiest of bedtime reads, not one for the beach, perhaps. But this is a stunning work of words, a dazzling linguistic spectacular. Language drawn from some forgotten archive, dusted off and set spinning here. So visually strong - James Gillray returns with a laptop? So where does it go from here? I would love to hear the radio play or see the late-night film version in some obscure club. Gorgeous.

Seringapatam wrote 109 days ago

This is very clever writing and I can see that you have used what you have described in the book to hook the reader right in and not let them go until you have finished with them. The descriptive voice is brilliant as that works well here too. The pace of the book is great and with your flow of the story I thing the mix is a winner for you. I can see good things for this book. Well done with it and I score this high.
Sean Connolly. British Army on the Rampage. (B.A.O.R) Please consider me for a read or watch list wont you??? Many thanks. Sean

Jeffrey Panzer wrote 109 days ago

Only read just a little, and I've only been on-site for a couple days, but this is the first work I've run across that I actually plan to read.

As my shelf is very nearly empty, your work has a spot for as long as it does.

CATHERINE SHAW wrote 113 days ago

This is amazing. Sorry I took so long. What a dark, weird, funny piece! What are you on? ha ha!! joking! It is very Spike Milligan/Stanley Unwin/You, me, bum bum trainesque, although it is your own.

Absolutely love it - fabload!!!! ******

MJ Gleason wrote 123 days ago

This is going on my watch list. The same way Faulkner wrote with the dialect of the US' Deep South this is written, with the right hyperbole, for a dialectical understanding of London. The madness and alienation that was only spoke of with polite innuendo during Vicotiran times is just hanging right out like a billboard.
I look forward to your reference book on death and weaponry as my story, Summer Of 1989, covers teen suicide and my narrator will need to know these things. Your feedback, too, would be an immense help. As an American with a soft spot for Time Lords it will be a chance to say, "Thanks, Doctor!". :-)

Lin55 wrote 130 days ago

Taste it. Feel it. Be consumed. I did, and I was. You are a genius. The six stars I gave feels like an insult to your writing.

R. Dango wrote 159 days ago

From the moment I started the first line of this book, I was transcended into the epoch of ignorance, prejudice, and madhouse - in the most elegant manner. The pain of 'Jack' and the despair of the situation told by the elegant lyric pierced through my heart.

This book makes many other books filled with shocking scenes described by crude street languages seem stale and worn out.

Definitely unique, and one of the most beautiful literatures I have read on this site.

R

Abby Vandiver wrote 202 days ago

Well, I love the landuage you use. It is delightful. But. I must confess I did'nt understand it. I'm sure it's me.

Abby

GOTHIC-PAGE-TURNER wrote 293 days ago

Devillish, decadent, daring - I couldn't avert my eyes from the spectacle that is Jack Coq.
This is a masterpiece - and quintessentially English.
AJB

Jonny Sambuca wrote 313 days ago

This is one of the first works on here to really grab me. There are a couple that have, but this is certainly my type of writing. Challenging and interesting. I shall read much more. Highest of stars. JS

Jonny Sambuca wrote 313 days ago

This is one of the first works on here to really grab me. There are a couple that have, but this is certainly my type of writing. Challenging and interesting. I shall read much more. Highest of stars. JS

ELAdams wrote 331 days ago

What I like about this is the unique voice - I can honestly say I've never read anything like it before! You invent your own language that makes sense in its own oddball way. Humorous and inventive, your originality stands out even if it's sometimes a little difficult to tell what is happening! High stars!

Emma, 'The Puppet Spell'

Jennwith2ns wrote 332 days ago

Reading further (and with a little assistance from our back-and-forth messaging), I have to say I'm getting much more drawn in to the story. "Getting darker" isn't necessarily a difficulty for me--I think I just react against "confrontive" (is that a word?) tones, which the first chapter contains in spades--legitimately, but still. I'm pretty sure that if you leave this book here for a while, eventually I will read the whole thing.

Jennwith2ns wrote 332 days ago

I wish to comment because I've read and it seems only polite, but I'm not entirely sure I can be helpful, because my instinct is just to copy and paste other people's comments below. Which is not very *original,* therefore, probably, not particularly valued by you. 'Twould be a sheeplike act, methinks.

Anyway. I think I'm glad we've messaged a bit before I read, because it was like a bicycle-training-wheels intro to your sense of humour, which, while I can recognise the humour, isn't mine. I feel like I'm reading a long monologue of one of the Shakespearean "Fool" characters, possibly merged with an Old Testament prophet. Abrasive, in-yer-face, somewhat head-spinning and eye-blinking and mysterious. My gripe is the extensive guilt-trip implied in the text if, for some reason, we happen not to like it. Clearly it fits the character of the . . . character . . . and the story, but it feels like, "You're a close-minded bigoted idiot if this happens not to be your style."

I'm just saying that to show that I am not controlled by guilt and manipulation. (Wait. Did you mean for me to do that?)

rikasworld wrote 348 days ago

It's very difficult to comment on this. It weird - but in a good way. Fantastic use of language both archaic and modern simultaneously. It's slightly Victorian music hall. All I can say is Almighty Jenkins!
Lots of stars.

whoster wrote 354 days ago

Arlequin,

I was planning on washing my hare, but I was prodded and badgered by Sharda to give this a read. You certainly are a mad bugger, which is fine if you have great wordplay, which you certainly have. Crammed with wonderfully lyrical toilet humour, the first three chapters were an authentic hoot.

Why the hell is this not labelled comedy? When I think of all the shite that masquerades as comedy on this site (good to see you have two fine examples on your shelf though), and to see this one void of the label, it's criminal. I've a good mind to drive down to Devon and give you a clip round the ear. Anyway, this is now on my watchlist with a view to a backing. Lashings of stars as a matter of course.

Sharda D wrote 355 days ago

OK, so not sure if I have been reading the rantings of a mad fool or if I am in the presence of complete and utter genius. Could go either way.
Your prose is utterly wonderful and unique. Phrases such as:
"Bollocks to this, I think. I am not public amusement for these bum merchants."
and, "Oh my arse, this is a nasty business of buggerage and I am at the heart of its folly."
and, "Bugger and bollocks, I am ripped."
and, "Now, I re-observe them, these gawpsters."
This is wonderfully free and inventive use of language and it leaps of the page. It is gloriously alive and visceral.
The only problem is, that I wasn't always entirely sure what was going on!
Now that's not a big problem, I'm tired and I would have that issue with Beckett or Joyce, but a publisher might be a little more fussy than me. This is certainly genius (I've made up my mind now), but it would be 100 times better if you slowed down slightly and took us gently by the hand just a touch more, then, I would not be surprised to see you on the Booker Prize short list!
6 stars for sheer genius (boy, I've used that word a lot, and I hardly ever use it) and inventiveness.
All the best,
Sharda.

Cecily Macintyre wrote 371 days ago

Just started reading this and I'm with kate - it's like listening to Caliban. And it's just so clever, 'Ignore all the little errors the slips and the stumbles. They can't be helped, not by me, not by any of us. Fell secure in them, certain of your superiority as you spot them, one after the other, a nice neat tally, nicks in your bloody fingers. But do not search them out.... Bugger the spellage, sod the wordage..."
But the wordage, the very clever wordage, is very much what this is about.

jrapilliard wrote 391 days ago

I have just backed your book as you ask. Will you return the compliment and back mine, Penrose - Princess of Penrith? If you do, many thanks.
Best wishes,
John

Juliet Blaxland wrote 406 days ago

Mercy, this is an original piece of palaverism! The author must indeed be a very clever cove...

katemb wrote 428 days ago

So original! I'm totally impressed by your prose. I feel like I've just spent four chapters with Shakespeare's favourite fool. He could even be Caliban washed up in some kind of Georgian London theatrical underworld. Guess I'll have to read on to find out.
Great to find such quality. Six stars
Kate
The Licenser
btw - what is a catanapse?

femmefranglaise wrote 439 days ago

What a marvellous rollercoaster of wonderfullness. Masterfully written, gloriously descriptive, unique. I bow before you, Sir!

Melanie
La Vie en Rosé

triggerusa wrote 447 days ago

wow, what an interesting messed up book :-) brilliant read. I read a few chapters with my dictionary out... great pace of book. I have added 5*****

Jimmy Threepwoood and the Veil of Darkness

olefish wrote 459 days ago

Ok. I bow before your wordsmithing. Very nice. Excuse me, if I go back now to cry over my lame imitations of writing. I would have to read a little more closely to you know, get to the heart of the story and such. I'll be back.

thanks for putting this up here.

Toby Wallis wrote 466 days ago

Very much enjoyed what I have read of this so far. Well done for committing so thoroughly to a typographical concept and on having a style of writing rich enough to warrant it.

Gwenna Frost wrote 470 days ago

Just started reading and having so much fun with it. As I read I am reminded of different plays I studied in theatre school and it just has such whimsy to it. I look forward to continue reading.
-GF

Lara wrote 476 days ago

Oh, and the witty dialogue is superb .

Put Not forcChildren on your pitch

Lara wrote 476 days ago

I remember backing this when in an earlier form. Much prefer it now. It is masterly. Not an easy read but unique and now fully worked out. You are v clever and creative and this is going on my shelf at the next space. Lara
A RELATIVE LOSS

AuroraNemesis wrote 494 days ago

What a crazy, mixed up, hysterically weird concept for a book.
I love it.
I was stunned when I read the first chapter, thinking is this thing for real. However, I could not stop reading.
Well written, fast pace and well thought out.
What can I say, but wow well done

elmo2 wrote 495 days ago

what cock is this, i like it much, though it puases oft before it thrusts upon the scene,dribbles before it speaks, capturing a rapt audiences attention, a gay bunch for sure, haha, read the first four chapters which is my usual, i guess it is elizabethan of some sort, and perhaps it has the history right, there are some great puns and good phrased turns, original i can not tell, well placed nonetheless,.i star it well, believing such langauge beyond my reach, i pay homage to that, not necessarily to its anatomie, though sure it a large means off the play, i will back this, mentally not pysically fearing what presenting a back my bring, best wishes

Oriax wrote 501 days ago

Just had another dip into Jack and am once again filled with sadness at the disappearance of the art of swearing, cursing, effing and blinding. What a loss to the English language. Just the sound of these curses makes me laugh. Thank goodness part of this fine heritage has been saved in these pages.
Jane

Philthy wrote 522 days ago

Hi AJS,

I’m here for our read swap. So sorry it’s taken me this long to get here. Below are my comments/findings. They are, of course, my humblest opinions, so take them for whatever they’re worth.

Love the pitches. Unique and captivating. It’s rare that I don’t have anything to say about a pitch.

This has a certain brilliance to it. I’ll be honest, though, at the same time it’s somewhat tedious to read, which will make it not for everyone. But those who can appreciate it will love it. I’m not sure the unique, inconsistent fonts do much for you but distract the reader. They can be eye sores, but others may disagree.

At any rate, well done. You’ve created some incredibly unique and your voice is captivating. Given the right demographic, this will do very well. Best of luck with it. Consider me a fan.

Phil
(Deshay of the Woods)

Oriax wrote 526 days ago

What can I say? Except that you must have had great fun writing this. I particularly enjoyed the scene in the rag merchant’s. Two images made me smile: the place swallowing and digesting the customers, the crone sticking her finger in her ear and Jack expecting to see it come out the other side.
The words you use are like the words children dream up, mangled and rearranged and perfectly intelligible. I bet you don’t get many people making helpful comments about grammar and commas.
As you say, Jack is a reading experience. I’ve given it as many stars as is humanly possible, but don’t ask me to comment on it – I think you are the only one with the credentials.
Jane.

Bryn Hammond wrote 530 days ago

I'm going to have to do a piece-by-piece, slow-of-arrival set of comments; you can't chomp through this one quickly, and besides, the book comes near to defeat comment. It's staggeringly original, though I can't help but think of Marat/Sade (I'm sorry if you don't want me to think of Marat/Sade, but I was much struck by that in my university days).

So this is just about the soliloquy that starts us off. Which is a spectacular feat. The spectacle that is: and I can picture him, and hear him, in his theatre. The second time (when I wasn't dazed) I began to read this aloud – the way I have to with drama; I walk about the house with a copy of Julius Casear and act out, and I'd do that with your book, if you were in a book, where you belong. Anyhow, I began to act out in my chair. It is so actable. It is a soliloquy in every sense. Whatever I mean by that. I mean, it's as much fun as quothing Coriolanus speeches to my flat walls. AS much fun.

The first time, I had to skip through – find my feet, I guess, in the bizarre – but on only the second attempt (it often takes more) I don't feel lost and can wallow.

I can write why every sentence is wonderful. But I dare say you know. Or I can, if you want; I'd be most happy to tell you why this sentence or that is a wonder among sentences.

Also, best title in the universe. Never change the title.

ZoeSelina wrote 531 days ago

This is exhausting, but amazing. I feel like you should be standing on a busy street-corner in your pyjamas throwing soiled wigs at passers-by and reciting this at varyingly loud and soft volume.

To be honest, I can't tell whether this is brilliant or self-indulgent. Maybe both? In any case, there are a lot of people I would buy this book for as gifts just so we could discuss it and feel a little of its insanity among us.

I'm going to back this, because I don't know what the hell else to do with it.

MichaelHerculesMoore wrote 538 days ago

This book is utter madness and yet I cannot look away as if I'm trapped in Arkham Asylum itself, and I find myself coming back for more lol

12