Book Jacket

 

rank 5847
word count 36212
date submitted 29.03.2012
date updated 28.11.2012
genres: Non-fiction, History, Christian, Re...
classification: universal
complete

The Author of Confusion

Steven Paul Brown

God has been misrepresented. His words have been plagerized and His teachings hijacked. Does anyone actually know what the Bible teaches any more?

 

Does God use Evolution? Should we pay for religion? Should we worship Mary? Is Jesus God? Is there any religion that is approved by God? The answers to these questions, and many more, can be found in the pages of the Bible. Find out how the religions of the world have allowed new ideologies and old traditions to replace the teachings of God. Read about the many unholy teachings that are not inspired by God but are really from the "Author of Confusion."

 
rate the book

to rate this book please Register or Login

 

tags

bible, church, comfort, death, god, holy spirit, islam, jesus, mary, religion, sin, soul, trinity

on 2 watchlists

15 comments

 

Text Size

Text Colour

Chapters

23

report abuse

What is a Christian?

 

 

Anyone can claim to be religious. We might believe in a supreme being, or angels or, even the tooth fairy. Such beliefs are personal and no-one can deny our right to believe what we want and to describe ourselves as “religious“.


 
But to call ourselves “Christian” is something completely different. That is a specific designation of faith, whereby we are announcing to the world that we believe in, and follow, the teachings of, the one and only Christ, Jesus. We cannot follow Jesus if we believe or teach something contrary to the things he taught. For example, Jesus was very clear on the matter of prejudice. He would not treat anyone negatively because of their religion, sex, or race. While it is true that many people today also have that positive attitude towards others, they do not need to be a Christian to have these qualities. But, conversely, a person must have those qualities to be a Christian.
 

 
Who decides what it means to be a Christian? Surely, the one who’s teachings a person claims to adhere to, Christ Jesus himself. If someone claims to be a follower, a disciple, of Jesus Christ, isn’t Jesus the one who should tell them if they are acceptable to him as one of his followers? Jesus is not on the earth today but, his words, his teachings are, in the pages of the Bible. If a person looks carefully at Jesus’ instructions in the Bible, they can measure themselves against the model of Christianity he set. The Apostle Peter wrote that Jesus left “a model for you to follow closely in his footsteps“ (1 Peter 2.21). Jesus set specific standards and indicators for Christians, and only by looking at these can we determine whether we are his followers or not.


 
Of course, there are obvious indicators as to what Jesus’ followers would be like. For example, Jesus expects his followers to do good to others, especially those in need. Jesus gave us the golden rule to live by, “do unto others as you would have them do unto you” (Matthew 7.12). However, Jesus was also realistic when he warned us that “there will be poor always” and that “in the last days, there will famines” (Matthew 24). These things would be prevalent until the kingdom comes.
 

 
Another indicator of real Christian behaviour would be a person’s attitude toward violence and war. Jesus warned that “whoever takes up the sword shall perish by the sword” and that Christians should “love your enemy and pray for those persecuting you” (Matthew 5.44). So, no Christian would take part in wars or battles, even for the country they are born in, even to stop injustice. Peter tried to fight for Jesus’ life but was stopped by Jesus himself. If a Christian can’t defend Jesus, the founder of Christianity, what cause could they possibly use violence for?


 
If Christianity has a badge, a uniform or an identifying mark, what is it? In all other religions in the world there are identifying characteristics or emblems, almost like flags. When we think of Islam we picture the beards of men or the “Hijab” that Muslim women wear. The Jewish people are identified by the skull cap or the “Star of David” even though this symbol has nothing to do with King David of the Bible but was actually adopted from a pagan religion centuries after David's death. Buddhists, (or at least the devout eastern ones), are known for their shaven heads, saffron robes and the symbol we see on many statues and books. But what of Christianity, what represents Christians?

 

Apart from the lavish robes, golden instruments and grandiose titles that the clergy award themselves, most denominations of Christendom use the cross as a sign of Christianity. Some more modern Christians use the sign of the fish. Catholics use statues of Mary and Jesus, as well as the cross. Why are these symbols used and would Jesus or His Father, Almighty God, approve of them being used to represent them?

 

There is some considerable doubt among scholars as to the type of implement that Jesus was executed upon. The cross (Latin “Crux”) may not have been used at the time of Jesus' death. In fact the cross was used as a religious symbol by pagan nations long before Jesus walked the earth. The ancient implement described in the gospels is the Greek word “stauros” which means a “stake” or even a “tree.” This was a piece of upright timber where a prisoner was hung by his wrists to die. Originally the stake was where dead people were hung as a symbol of warning and shame. This was reserved for those who had disgraced themselves in God's eyes. After they were killed, according to the law, their body would be hung up for all to see, as the Bible says at Deuteronomy 21.22; “And in case there comes to be in a man a sin deserving the sentence of death, and he has been put to death, and you have hung him upon a stake, his dead body should not stay all night on the stake; but you should by all means bury him on that day, because something accursed of God is the one hung up.” This was one of the reasons why Jesus resisted His death, because He would be publicly labelled a blasphemer, an accusation that was painful to Him.

 

Even if Jesus did die on a cross, is it right to adopt that symbol as the sign of Christianity? Many argue that they use the cross as a reminder of Jesus' suffering and sacrifice. But imagine if someone you loved was falsely accused of a crime, framed and sentenced to death. Despite their innocence, they were executed by hanging.  Would you wear or display a noose around your neck or on your wall? Furthermore, would you make a little image of your friend and put their head inside the noose? I love Jesus, but I think of Him as a glorious king, not a corpse in a deathtrap.

 

But what of the statues of Jesus and Mary that people use, are they any better? The Bible tells us that we should not worship any human being and that prayers can only be accepted by God through Jesus Christ, no-one else. When the Apostle John went to kneel before the angel in revelation, the angel stopped him and said Be careful! Do not do that! All I am is a fellow slave of you and of your brothers who have the work of witnessing to Jesus. Worship God” (Revelation 19.10). The Bible tells us “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, a man, Christ Jesus” (1 Timothy 2.5).  Regarding humans, including “the saints”, God's word says that “all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.”

 

If any doubt remains that Christians should not use any images (of people or fish), or crosses in their worship, consider one of the commandments in the Bible, commandments which Jesus himself obeyed and upheld;

 

You must not make for yourself a carved image or a form like anything that is in the heavens above or that is on the earth underneath or that is in the waters under the earth” (Exodus 20.4).

 

That you may not act ruinously and may not really make for yourselves a carved image, the form of any symbol, the representation of male or female, the representation of any beast that is in the earth, the representation of any winged bird that flies in the heavens, the representation of anything moving on the ground, the representation of any fish that is in the waters under the earth” (Deuteronomy 4.16).

 

The Apostle John confirmed this teaching when He warned “Guard yourselves from idols” (1 John 5.21).

 

Is it not crystal clear in God's word that symbols and statues do not represent Christianity?

 

So is there a “sign” of Christianity, an identifying mark? Yes there is. Jesus told us what it would be. After warning about the turmoil and chaos that would engulf the earth in our time, He revealed that “all will know that you are my disciples (Christians) if you have love among yourselves” (John 13.35). Yes, love (Greek - “Agape”), self-sacrificing love would be the mark of a true Christian. It is not worn or hung on a wall. It cannot be mass produced and sold in churches and religious stalls, and unlike wood and metal, it never wears out, or, as the Bible puts it, “Love never fails” (1 Corinthians 13.8). 

 

What should be the most important thing in a Christian's life? Well, what was the most important thing in Jesus’ life? Jesus tells us at (John 4.34);


 
“It is my food to do the will of him that sent me”

 

Who sent Jesus? Jesus goes on to tell us in the gospels. He says, “no one can come to me unless the Father, who sent me, draws him” (John 6.44). We are forcefully told in Matthew 7.21,22 that, when Jesus judges the world, “many will say to me “Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and expel demons in your name, and perform many powerful works in your name?” Yet, Jesus rejects these ones because, in his words, they do not “do the will of my Father who is in heaven“.
 
 
 
Later Jesus publicly prayed to his Father “I have made your name known among men”. Who is this “Father” who’s name Jesus made known? Is he important to Christians? He obviously is to Jesus.
 

 
The name Jesus was referring to is the name of his Father, Almighty God. That divine name is recorded in the original manuscripts of the Bible. In Hebrew, the name would read something like “Yahweh.” The nearest modern English equivalent, which has been used for centuries, is “Jehovah” (please see Psalm 83.18). This is the Father that Jesus loves so much and does the will of. (For more information on God's name, please see the chapter “The Bible's Greatest Secret” in my other book “A Supernatural Book – The Bible”).


 
Now, every person who claims to be a Christian needs to ask themselves, “Do I know and recognise the Father? Do I do his will? Do I love him the way that Jesus loves him?” Some may object and say that the only one we need to know is Jesus but, Jesus himself emphasises that Christians should worship his Father (John 4.23). Jesus also describes his Father as “my God” (John 20.17, Revelation 3.12).


 
In prayer, Jesus said “This means everlasting life, their taking in knowledge of you, the only true God, and the one you sent forth, Jesus Christ” (John 17.3). Everyone claiming to be a Christian needs to ask themselves, “Do I take in knowledge of Jesus and his Father? Does my church recognise the Father?” If not, then perhaps we are just religious rather than Christian.

Chapters

23

report abuse

To leave comments on this or any book please Register or Login

subscribe to comments for this book
Moomintroll wrote 188 days ago

Hello Roslyn

Thanks for the feedback

I agree with you about the media, they have their own agenda in every subject and we tend to get molded the way they want us.

It doesn't surprise me that those involved in the "hard sciences" (physics, biology, astronomy) have more faith than those involved in pseudo-sciences such as psychology and philosophy. When someone intimately examines God's magnificent creation, whether on a microscopic or universal level, they cannot help but be overawed by it's perfection and design.

I read most of your book. I like it, a condensed journey through the bible in bite-size pieces, very easy to follow. I think it will help people to familiarise themselves with Gods word.

I don't agree with everything you write in it but, I am very glad you use God's personal name, not many people do these days, sadly. Did you know that you have a fraction symbol scattered throughout the pages of your book? I think it must be a broken key or something (or is it intentional?).

Keep up the good work.

Regards

Steve

.

Yes, i also believe the press and culture and publications are also responsible for ideas presented in s are ongoing and ever changing with new observations and facts collected. Theory is ever changing in light of the rest. Your arguments are good and to point out but I don't really think it is science itself is the causes the falling away from Scripture. My husband an avid reader in fact found an article in the Chronicle of Higher Education years ago that had information about faith and profession, findings from a study found that the hard sciences had more believers of Christ than the profession of psychology. I am not sure any present day studies have been done to confirm this finding but I do know that more and more studies are becoming harder and harder to perform because this data is not being collected or becoming illegal to collect. Even along with data to support such findings or to allow such studies. You are making some good points here. Your arguments are laid out in a comprehensive way. I will give your work high stars and hope for you the best on getting your work published.
Roslyn
"I Am" Through the Ages, for your seeking heart
Scribe-Lings, for your child like heart

Blancherose wrote 194 days ago

Yes, i also believe the press and culture and publications are also responsible for ideas presented in science even more than the scientific community does all on it's own. The scientist know their work and findings are ongoing and ever changing with new observations and facts collected. Theory is ever changing in light of the rest. Your arguments are good and to point out but I don't really think it is science itself is the causes the falling away from Scripture. My husband an avid reader in fact found an article in the Chronicle of Higher Education years ago that had information about faith and profession, findings from a study found that the hard sciences had more believers of Christ than the profession of psychology. I am not sure any present day studies have been done to confirm this finding but I do know that more and more studies are becoming harder and harder to perform because this data is not being collected or becoming illegal to collect. Even along with data to support such findings or to allow such studies. You are making some good points here. Your arguments are laid out in a comprehensive way. I will give your work high stars and hope for you the best on getting your work published.
Roslyn
"I Am" Through the Ages, for your seeking heart
Scribe-Lings, for your child like heart

Moomintroll wrote 194 days ago

Hello Michael

Thank you for the positive feedback and the advice. I appreciate what you are saying about reviewing others work and editing but, unfortunately, my circumstances don't permit me to spend much time and energy on "Autonomy." But I will try, starting with your book. Did you know that you spelled the word "greatest" wrong in your introduction?

I am very surprised that you believe what you do about the trinity. I haven't met many people who questioned the doctrine and I have met many who ferociously (often in a very unChristian manner!) defend it. It is a pleasure to make your acquaintance. I would be very interested in hearing your opinion on the other chapters of my book, if you have the time to read them. I will give you some feedback on your book as soon as I get some time.

All the best.

Steve



Hi Steve't
I like your introduction. We must stand on what the Bible actually states, not man's imterpretation of it that completely contradicts what is plainly written.
I have read your chapter on the Trniity. Whereas myself I can accept a 'Trinity' if you like, I know it could not be an equal Trinity for the Father is greater than the Son(John14:28) and the Father is the one true God(John17:3)
There is nowhere written in the Bible that Christ is the one true God, or that eternal life hinges on such a belief, it is a man made demand that became official 300 years after Christ died on the cross.
I admire you sticking with scripture on this rather than being persuaded by man. For this reason alone,I am happy to give your book a spin on my bookshelf. I will try and read more of your writing as time allows

BTW
I was pleased to read your understanding of John 10:30 by quoting John17:21&22, I myself have often quoted the latter to others to explain the former. It is an encouragement to me that I am not alone such thinking.
God Bless

Michael12 wrote 194 days ago

Hi Steve
I like your introduction. We must stand on what the Bible actually states, not man's imterpretation of it that completely contradicts what is plainly written.
I have read your chapter on the Trniity. Whereas myself I can accept a 'Trinity' if you like, I know it could not be an equal Trinity for the Father is greater than the Son(John14:28) and the Father is the one true God(John17:3)
There is nowhere written in the Bible that Christ is the one true God, or that eternal life hinges on such a belief, it is a man made demand that became official 300 years after Christ died on the cross.
I admire you sticking with scripture on this rather than being persuaded by man. For this reason alone,I am happy to give your book a spin on my bookshelf. I will try and read more of your writing as time allows

BTW
I was pleased to read your understanding of John 10:30 by quoting John17:21&22, I myself have often quoted the latter to others to explain the former. It is an encouragement to me that I am not alone with such thinking.
God Bless

Moomintroll wrote 311 days ago

Hello J

Thank you for your positive comments and for backing my book. Yes, I am glad to bring attention to god's word, even if it is because of contoversy. I appreciate your support.

I was intrigued by the subject of your own book and I intend to read at least some of it (when I get a breather!) . I have sometimes asked myself if my attitude towards the Bible might be different if I were a woman. But, like you, I have taken the time and effort to try to understand God's thinking about His female creation. I have found that, far from demeaning women or relegating their importance to him, God values and cherishes women as much as he does men. We all have our place and part to play in God's divine plan and I have always found that life runs more smoothly when we co-operate with His will instead of resisting it.

I will let you have my thoughts on your book when I have read some.

Regarding your comments about me including references, I'm not sure what you mean. I always refer to the scriptures to back up everything I say.

I wish you peace.

Steve

i understand your message in this book. and people need to do their homework. this requires a Bible and some references, and then they can draw their own conclusions. either they will agree with you or have reason to disagree. but to get believers to think is necessary, and i think you have done that. i must say that if you don't have a list of references, you should, even if there are not many. this will add credibility to your work, which you must have due its topic....
j
what every woman should know

scargirl wrote 313 days ago

i understand your message in this book. and people need to do their homework. this requires a Bible and some references, and then they can draw their own conclusions. either they will agree with you or have reason to disagree. but to get believers to think is necessary, and i think you have done that. i must say that if you don't have a list of references, you should, even if there are not many. this will add credibility to your work, which you must have due its topic....
j
what every woman should know

Moomintroll wrote 317 days ago

Hello David

Thank you for your positive comments. I am definately with you in the defence of God's word. I know that we may not agree on all of the Bible's teachings but, it is good to be able to discuss the Bible with you.

I wish you well.

Snufkin

Your book is a bold attempt to address a vast and compelling issue in the professing Church. You evidently have a zeal for the Bible and your effort is indeed. The Bible, as you noted, is increasingly being pushed to the back burner and it is my hope that your work would contribute to awakening Christians to the critical place of the divine Word and its indispensability to faith and practice. The imperative of a work like yours is heightened by the fact that there also seems to be a calculated attempt to completely discredit the Word and rid it of its authority. The consequences of the success of such in any quarter can only be imagined. Thanks for this offering. Grace be with you always.

David Olawoyin wrote 317 days ago

Your book is a bold attempt to address a vast and compelling issue in the professing Church. You evidently have a zeal for the Bible and your effort is indeed. The Bible, as you noted, is increasingly being pushed to the back burner and it is my hope that your work would contribute to awakening Christians to the critical place of the divine Word and its indispensability to faith and practice. The imperative of a work like yours is heightened by the fact that there also seems to be a calculated attempt to completely discredit the Word and rid it of its authority. The consequences of the success of such in any quarter can only be imagined. Thanks for this offering. Grace be with you always.

Moomintroll wrote 334 days ago

Thank you for the feedback, I appreciate it.

I should start out by acknowledging that I am not a qualified scientist and by pointing out that my book is not aimed at the scientifically informed community but, rather at those of a religious background whose faith in God and the Bible are being eroded by an unscrupulous elite in the world of science who are dressing up philosophical statements as scientific facts.

You mention a lack of references yet, I have cited all my sources. The two quotes you referred to are from two highly respected publications in the world of science and medicine. I chose these quotes because even the most highly critical scientists who promote evolutionary biology would have to respect them. The quote from the journal “Nature” is from 1997. I am not sure of the exact date but you could probably check with their own records. I am not sure of the date of the the quote from the “American Medical Association.” It was pre-1980 because the publication I saw the quote in was printed in 1980 and the publishers use recent quotes in their publications.

I agree with you about some of my ambiguous statements. I will change the wording regarding global warming. You were right in assuming that I was referring to the e-mail scandal. I think that that unfortunate disclosure was seized upon to discredit the whole idea of climate change. But I personally accept climate change as a reality and an injustice perpetrated through human greed and ignorance. The point I was making is that many scientists who are in the pockets of large commercial corporations have been challenging the validity of data about global warming. This has caused much confusion and mistrust among the general public.

On Schreodinger's cat, I did perhaps oversimplify the subject and I do not pretend to fully comprehend the author's ideas but, it's admirers and supporters have gone to the opposite extreme and have attached too much significance to it. It may well be provocative and stimulating, and it may lead to future scientific breakthroughs but, it remains philosophy, not actual science, and I believe that this difference needs to be highlighted to the public.

Regarding your comment about my work being “views easily read on blogs all over the web,” I am a little disappointed that you think so. Although the opening chapters deal with science and reason, the main theme of my book is the confusion, misinterpretation and erosion of faith in God and the Bible. The facts I bring to light are rejected rigorously by mainstream religions and I have actually found myself the object of verbal abuse because of the things I write. Perhaps you need to read more of the book to get the full flavour and see the controversy. One example of an unpoular and inconvenient truth is Jesus' position on war. Christinaity does not allow for it's disciples to support the conflicts of their nations. In fact, genuine Christianity demands absention from all poliitcal involvement in the world, this is the teaching of Christ.

Why should someone choose to read my book over those others? Because my book contains the facts, the truth according to the Bible itself. My own experience and grounding is of little consequence other than to say that I was once a pawn of evolution and I am now a firm believer in a creator and that the Bible is His inspired word. This transformation is not due to emotion or a religious vision but, to an examination of the fundamental realities in the natural world, the laws of physics, and the internal evidence of the Bible itself. I have read and studied the Bible several times, over 15 years. But the Bible itself does not require man's educational accolades to understand it or relate it to others. The Bible says “our being adequately qualified issues from God” (2 Corinthians 3.4).

I have no desire to “grab people's attention” or to “find a market.” I imitate Jesus and “bare witness to the truth,” wherever it may lead me, and at whatever cost.

I do hope you continue to read my book and that you enjoy it. Feel free to comment further.

I wish you well.

Steve

SirFurboy wrote 336 days ago

Hi there,

I just took a look at your book. I have read four chapters in, so this may not be a fully representative critique, but I wanted to give you some pointers.

The first thing that hit me was a lack of references. I know you don't want this work to read like an academic treatise but when I read your remark about 80% of scientists believing in a designed universe by a higher power, I wanted to follow that up, as in an unrelated thread on another site, someone referenced a much lower number of about 35% believing this. Different surveys no doubt, but it really should be verifiable.

Your writing style is easy going, but a few times you seemed to gloss over details. For instance you said "issues such as global warming ... have left a bitter taste". I was unsure what you mean here. You seem to assume that your readers will agree about something scientists have done in the global warming issue that would cause a bitter taste. If you are referring to the East Angliang climate email scandal, you should really describe the whole thing. Personally I think right wing politics have caused just as much of a bitter taste w.r.t global warming - so take care that you do not make your book assume that it will only be read by climate change sceptics. If that is the case I think its appeal will be very limited indeed.

On Schreodinger's cat - well done for spelling his name with an umlaut! But again the details are way to sketchy. You do not seem to have understood the nature of the thought experiemnt (which was, after all, a critique of quantum theory!) The point is that one could not know the status of the cat without observing it - directly or indirectly.

No one actually believes the cat exists in both states of living and dead until observed, of course. But the experiment was a critique of the quantum theory that suggested particles only flipped into one state or another when observed (and there is some very interesting science as to why that should be).

So at this point, my views were a little "yes but"... I am sure that you speak a great deal of truth in what you write, but I think the problem for your book is this: you are expressing views easily read on blogs all over the web. Why should someone choose to read your book over those? What is your own experience and grounding? What do you offer to this debate that is new and novel?

I think you need something that grab's people's attention and makes them want to read your work, or else it could be a finished book struggling to find a market.

All the best with your writing.

Moomintroll wrote 401 days ago

Hello Dianna

Thank you for your positive comments, I appreciate it.

I'm surprised you think that my thoughts are "mainstream." In my experience most Christians I have met believe that the holy spirit is God in a trinity. They also support the wars of their nations.

I am intrigued as to what your own beliefs are. Can you let me know please?

I wish you well.

Steve


Steven,

I just read your chapters - What is the holy spirt and what is a Christian. I found both of them full of truth although you seem to come at things through the back door. The way both chapters begin, I got the feeling that you were going to say something very controversial, but then as you talk through your Biblical findings, I see that your beliefs are on the spectrum of a main-stream Christianity. It is very evident that you are a deep-thinker and have touched on a variety of questions that the seeker of Christ should be asking. Highly starred.
Dianna Lanser
Nothing But The Blood

Dianna Lanser wrote 401 days ago

Steven,

I just read your chapters - What is the holy spirt and what is a Christian. I found both of them full of truth although you seem to come at things through the back door. The way both chapters begin, I got the feeling that you were going to say something very controversial, but then as you talk through your Biblical findings, I see that your beliefs are on the spectrum of a main-stream Christianity. It is very evident that you are a deep-thinker and have touched on a variety of questions that the seeker of Christ should be asking. Highly starred.
Dianna Lanser
Nothing But The Blood

Su Dan wrote 412 days ago

this is an interesting book and a must read....
l must back...
read SEASONS...

Moomintroll wrote 415 days ago

I am sorry if I offended you Junetee.

I did not say "all" the church teachings and I did not mean "all" churches. If someone made such a claim against my religion, I would be interested to hear why they said such things.

My accusations against the general standard of Christendom are already well documented in the realms of historical and Biblical scholars. More importantly, I do provide the required evidence thorughout the book, from the Bible itself. Jesus and His Apostles warned that there would be changes to the truth in our day and that there would be many "false teachers." in the world. If you had read further in my book, you would have seen the evidence. At the end of the day, these accusations are not from me but from Jesus Himself. Every claim I make I back up with scripture.

The Bible says that we should "keep testing every inspired expression to see if it originates with God." Not enough people compare what their churches teach with what the Bible says.

If you do not want to read anymore of my book, I respect your decision but I wish you would because my book actually defends pure Christianity against the subversive teachings of men.

As I said, it is not my intention to offend but, neither will I withold the truth. Jesus was outspoken where necessary and I try to immitate Him.

I wish you well.

Steve

I have just begun to read your book.
I got as far as 'Today the so called representatives etc'.
I'd like to say I do not agree that the doctrines of the church are almost unrecognisable from the simple but profound teachings found in the Holy Bible.. You don't actually say which church or which doctrines or teachings. And what proof do you base this on.
And what evidence do you have to lay such claim that many of the teachings have more in common with politics and finance than with the Bible?
Facts and evidence are important if you are going to state claims like these. A lot of people will be offended by what you have said. I'm sorry but didn't read any further because to me, a study of religion or the bible must have some references,,facts and evidence where necessary.
Junetee(Four Corners)
Junetee (Four Corners)

junetee wrote 415 days ago

I have just begun to read your book.
I got as far as 'Today the so called representatives etc'.
I'd like to say I do not agree that the doctrines of the church are almost unrecognisable from the simple but profound teachings found in the Holy Bible.. You don't actually say which church or which doctrines or teachings. And what proof do you base this on.
And what evidence do you have to lay such claim that many of the teachings have more in common with politics and finance than with the Bible?
Facts and evidence are important if you are going to state claims like these. A lot of people will be offended by what you have said. I'm sorry but didn't read any further because to me, a study of religion or the bible must have some references,,facts and evidence where necessary.
Junetee(Four Corners)
Junetee (Four Corners)

1