Book Jacket

 

rank 4803
word count 38829
date submitted 16.05.2008
date updated 26.12.2012
genres: Non-fiction, History, Biography, Ha...
classification: universal
complete

HOME THOUGHTS FROM ABROAD

Michael Dickinson

Scathing articles about Britain from an ex-pat socialist living in Istanbul, first published in America's Best Political Newsletter, COUNTERPUNCH. .

 

Articles about the behaviour of the British Royal Family, Her Majesty's Government, Church, Police, and Social System, seen through the eyes of a traitorous Englishman in exile.

 
rate the book

to rate this book please Register or Login

 

tags

church, government, revolution, royalty

on 2 watchlists

14 comments

 

Text Size

Text Colour

Chapters

22

report abuse

Weekend Edition September 16-18, 2011

 

London Log

“Bad Laws Have to be Broken!”

by MICHAEL DICKINSON

London.

On Tuesday morning, September 13th, as I was taking the sun at the open flap of my tent in the Peace Camp opposite the Houses of Parliament in London’s Westminster Square, a young man came along with a tray selling slices of fruit and ginger cake that he had made. He gave me a piece. Very nice. He also had some leaflets about the Defense and Security Equipment International (DSEI), the world’s largest arms fair which is held in London every two years, opening that day at the Excel Centre in London Docklands. There was a smallish protest meeting in a park nearby in front of Parliament so I went to it. There I was given a shopping basket full plastic bombs, gas cannisters and bullets, and queued up with other protesters to have them weighed at a mock-up cashdesk, a parody of the Arms Fair itself where repressive regimes including Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and Israel were buying and selling for real at the Excel Centre. I refused to pay. A protest march to the Excel Centre was announced for the next day, but I decided to walk there then and join the protest going on outside. It was twittered that trains going to the venue were being delayed by activists, but the cost would have been proscriptive on my budget anyway. London bus and rail fares are way higher than any other European city.

I stopped for lunch at the Tower of London where I dined on a whole fish and some chips, a whole hot dog with just a bite out of it, and five strawberries found on a scour of the rubbish bins in the busy touristy square outside (Freegan’s Luck!) and then went on my way. However I soon found that the area had changed a lot compared to the 1992 street map I was consulting and after walking through the hideously long fume-filled Rotherhithe tunnel (only used by approximately 20 pedestrians a day), and learning that London Docklands was still nearly an hour’s walk away, I decided to visit a friend in nearby Deptford instead. After a bath it was getting dark and I was ready to get back a bus back to my little tent in Westminster. My friend told me to inform her of the bus fare into town, but when the bendy bus arrived at the stop most people got on in the middle door and sat down without paying, so I followed suit.

On Wednesday morning I heard on the radio that it was the second day of the Trade Union Congress conference at its London headquarters Hall not too far away, so I decided to go and hand out flyers for the 2012 World Strike to people as they came out of the meeting. A few other groups were also distributing leaflets and pamphlets outside, mostly ignored by the exiting fat cat-looking delegates. One plump woman with the latest hairstyle and handbag stopped and glared at me through her glasses when I called after her: “Learn what the people think!” However, I liked some of the fighting talk against the government that had been going on inside.

GMB leader Paul Kenny declared: “Bad laws have to be broken. Civil disobedience in protest at erosion of civil liberties and freedoms has a place in our history.” And Len McCluskey, general secretary of Britain’s biggest union Unite said: “We will give politicians the biggest campaign of civil disobedience their tiny minds have ever seen.”

Returning to my tent in the early evening with a takeaway cup of tea to sup, while passing the large rotund Westminster Methodist City Hall I noticed a large banner hanging down outside proclaiming that the World Nuclear Association was holding its 36th Annual Symposium, their theme being: “The Future of Nuclear Power: Now It’s Down to Us.” I nearly spilled my tea, I was so shocked. Perusing the scheduled list of topics, which included ‘Fukushima – why the overreaction?’ I determined to be outside the hall in the morning to join the picket/protest as guests arrived for the first lecture at 9am. Surely there would be one?

Next morning when I arrived at the hall at 8.45, I found no protestors outside, but delegates and guests, many of a Korean appearance, entering the building and going up the grand stairs to the reception area. I followed them. At the desk I explained that I was a journalist and would like to sit in on the introductory lecture. After a coming and going of assistants to see if it were possible I was told that it was impossible as press places had already been filled. I thanked them and went outside. Taking a position on the other side of the narrow road opposite the front entrance, I began my harangue. Luckily I’d written down a few phrases to chant, and I blared them at the top of my voice so they echoed around the area and right into the building. This was no time for a politely held up banner. I repeated each slogan about 5 times each in succession.

“NO, NO, NUCLEAR, NO!” “PROFITEERS OF PERIL!” “SHAME ON THE METHODIST CHURCH!” “SAFE ALTERNATIVE ENERGY!”

While I was shouting a couple of security officials, a man and a woman came out and approached me. They asked how long I would be. I told them I would stop when Big Ben struck nine, the scheduled start of the first lecture, and so I did, but was glad to see that my words did not go unnoticed by those attending the meeting, some of whom stepped out of black-windowed limousines.

“CHEAPSKATES!” was the last line I threw at them.

After I had treated myself to some yoghurt and honey in my tent (my voice was a little hoarse) I set off to walk to Camden Town on an errand. Halfway up Whitehall, just near the entrance to Downing Street, I came upon one of the bendy buses that I had used to get from Deptford the night before. It was stopped at the side of the road and passengers were being interviewed by policemen and women, about 8 in number. I stopped and enquired what was going on.

When asked what business it was of mine, I told them I was a journalist. When I was unable to produce a press card I was told to mind my own business and not to interfere, especially by a plain-clothes cop in a black T shirt and rucksack who had been posing as a passenger on the bus.

As they took down the details of passengers who hadn’t paid the fares, I watched horrified as they handcuffed a Chinese man and woman, his hands behind his back, hers in front. “The van should be here soon,” one policeman reassured them. The woman sank to her knees.

When I got to Trafalgar Square I found that the living statues and performers that usually populate the large area in front of the National Gallery were not there. The place seemed empty without them. I saw a black guy I recognized as a regular busker and a white girl sitting on the flagstones next to some hoops.

I asked why no-one was doing anything. The girl pointed to a black uniformed policeman standing in the middle of the area. She said that he had arrived and announced that all performers must have a permit to do their acts or they would be arrested. “I’ve been doing my hulahoop thing for a couple of years here,” said the girl. ”I’m trying to pay off a huge university fee. This will not help at all.”

We went and talked to the policeman. He admitted that performers without permits had been using the space for over twenty years, and he was sympathetic, but there was nothing he could do about it. He said he was only acting on orders. The girl was considering beginning her act and seeing what would happen when I left them.

Today was the last day of the World Nuclear Association’s conference. It was a sunny morning and I thought, what the hell, I’ll go and give it to them again. I went to the Methodist Central Hall, only a couple of minutes walk from my tent in Westminster Square and started my ranting. The male security official came out and asked when I would stop. I told him at nine and he went away. I went through my litany again, but added a few more barbed but not personal comments about those participating in the conference as they entered the hall. I got rather carried away and didn’t here the clock. The official came out and told me that it was two minutes after nine.

I went away completely forgetting to let rip with the chant that I had composed with coffee that morning:

“FUCK YOU! FUCK YOU! FUCK YOU SHEEMAH!”

 

Chapters

22

report abuse

To leave comments on this or any book please Register or Login

subscribe to comments for this book
CATHERINE SHAW wrote 148 days ago

Another one starred. I love your work

Cathy

bannism4 wrote 810 days ago

I stumbled across this Michael. It is too good for this site. Nuff said.

zap wrote 1241 days ago

hi michael, I enjoyed your frank voice and Hyde Park Corner approach. There are some juicy details here and your call for change is clearly written between the lines. Polished writing. Backed.

Francesco wrote 1251 days ago

BRILLIANT!!!!
The world is about perspective.
BACKED!!!!!!

Andrew W. wrote 1256 days ago

Home Thoughts From Aboard

Hi Michael,

I've read a couple of yours, Judas and Mother Teresa, great writing, very polished, what you would expect from a professional, you clearly don't have the time to visit this site often enough to get your work the further exposure it deserves, in fact with quotes from the Guardian etc. I wonder why you are using this site at all apart from the promote your excellent work. Really interesting stuff here, not only a great writer but you have a lovely slantways views on life, an observational and reflective locus that enables us to get inside familiar issues from an unfamiliar angle.

Well done, will back this and will do everything I can to promote your work. Your help with SL in this month of December would be very welcome.

Best wishes and good luck
Andrew W
(Sanctuary's Loss)

Jack Stirling wrote 1256 days ago

Being an expat I backed your book before reading it. I have been up to my ears with work and also completing Blindfold which is now here in all its beauty!!! Please give it a glance if you find time.

marion wrote 1482 days ago

You are too clever for comfort. Of course you know your prose is excellent easy and capitvating to read...historical facts thrown in at the right moment are interesting and provide one of the many records of a day millions watched enjoyed approved of.
I dont want to give my views on any of the political content I dont feel this is an appropriate platform. I would guess that reading my profile you would know the likely stance i would take. anyway.
So my thoughts are on your writing skills which are soo practised professional and provocative. very well written. Marion

Michael Dickinson wrote 1818 days ago

I spent the afternoon compiling this article, trying to get it finished before going in to teach a class I had unexpectedly been called in for this evening.

When i got back tonight there were 3 comments from readers in my inbox, so I discovered that Counterpunch had published it. It was a rewarding feeling.

The story is terrifying.
http://www.counterpunch.org/dickinson05282008.html

Michael Dickinson wrote 1828 days ago

Apology accepted.

But the existence of an enormously privileged, fabulously wealthy, so-called 'royal' family, who consider themselves superior to other human beings, who are saluted as 'majesties' and eat off gold plates while many of their 'subjects' starve, is something I will not accept.

cutley wrote 1828 days ago

Sorry, Michael, perhaps I was a little brusque. I apologise.

Michael Dickinson wrote 1830 days ago

Arise, Sir Cutley!

cutley wrote 1830 days ago

How odd that anyone can be this worked up about the royal family.

Michael Dickinson wrote 1830 days ago

Remembering Princess Diana
Who's Cheating?
By MICHAEL DICKINSON

There must have been more than a few who suddenly stiffened at the opening words of the Bishop of London, Right Reverend Dr Richard Chartres, when he took the pulpit to address the congregation gathered in the Guard's Chapel near Buckingham Palace, to celebrate the 10th anniversary of Princess Diana's death.

For several long moments he stood there, his head bowed in silence, before he looked up and asked a simple direct question.

"Who's cheating?"

Again he paused, uncomfortably long for several members of the royal family and invited guests to ask themselves if he could possibly be talking about them. They would have wiped the metaphorical sweat from their brow and breathed a sigh of relief as the Bishop continued.

"Those were the words of Princess Diana to a pair of elderly inmates playing a game of Beggar My Neighbour' at an old folk's home which she was visiting. How they all laughed."

His question was not a challenge to the morals of the congregation, but merely a reminder of the natural fun and spontaneity of the princess and her intuitive rapport with members of the public, which he went on to eulogize. But still, his first stark question seemed to linger in the air like a bad smell, stronger than the perfume of the profusion of English roses that decked the chapel.

"Who's cheating?" Who's playing around? Who's being unfaithful to their wedding vows? Who's having an extra-marital affair? Who is committing adultery?

Many eyes may have shifted for a moment from the pontificating priest in the pulpit to ponder uncomfortably on the backs of the heads of three of the most important guests in the front pew Queen Elizabeth, the Duke of Edinburgh, and their son, the Prince of Wales. How had the question affected them?

At least Elizabeth could not accuse herself, her fidelity unquestioned, (or was there more to her close relationship with Lord Porchester in the fifties and sixties than a shared passion for racing, and Prince Andrew the result?); but she may have reflected sadly on her role as a world-famous cuckquean, cheated on countless times in the past by the sour-faced old man sitting next to her, the man she used to call "my viking prince".

Apart from a long term affair with the Queen's cousin, Princess Alexandra, Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh, was a well-known womaniser in his hey-day, with a string of affairs with polo wives, duchesses, countesses, and several famous actresses, including, it is alleged, Jane Russell, Zsa Zsa Gabor, and Shirley MacLaine. Yet this was the man who wrote to his daughter-in-law Diana calling her a "harlot and a trollop", telling her that she should put up with his son's long running affair with Camilla Parker Bowles.

Yes, to the lugubrious-faced son, sitting next to the Duke on the front pew at the service in memory of his ex-wife, the question, "Who's cheating?" must have rung most accusingly. If he had abandoned mistress Camilla after the fairy-tale wedding to his adoring virgin bride Diana, and remained faithful to her alone, then there would have been none of the scandalous mire of events that led Diana to her conducting her own extra-marital affairs, most notably with red-haired cavalry officer James Hewitt (rumoured to be Prince Harry's real father), and eventually to her tragic untimely death in the Paris car crash with her latest amour, Harrod's heir Dodi al-Fayed.

But Charles admitted in a television interview in 1994 that he had never loved Diana, and that during the marriage he had been carrying on an affair with Mrs Parker Bowles, who he had originally met at a polo match may years before.

"There were three of us in this marriage, so it was a bit crowded," a teary eyed Diana explained for the break up with Charles in her own retaliatory TV interview.

The place next to Charles on the front pew at the memorial service was conspicuously empty. His now wife, Her Royal Majesty, Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, although invited by her stepsons, had decided it more appropriate that she not attend, saying that she feared her presence would detract from what should be a celebration of Diana's life. Instead, the woman whom Diana called "the Rottweiler" watched the service on television alone at her country home. Next week she plans to jet off without her husband for a holiday in the Meditteranean with a small group of girlfriends.

Camilla had originally intended to be there at her husband's side, and is said to be furious at having been pressured by royal aides to decline, but perhaps it's just as well she wasn't.

Although a strong-minded woman, perhaps she too might have quailed and trembled at the Bishop of London's sudden question from the pulpit. An accusation from beyond the grave from the ex-wife of the man she had secretly committed adultery with, and caused such pain and misery:

"Who's cheating?"

Michael Dickinson wrote 1830 days ago

Fuch Faschism!!!!

1