Book Jacket

 

rank 4811
word count 38829
date submitted 16.05.2008
date updated 26.12.2012
genres: Non-fiction, History, Biography, Ha...
classification: universal
complete

HOME THOUGHTS FROM ABROAD

Michael Dickinson

Scathing articles about Britain from an ex-pat socialist living in Istanbul, first published in America's Best Political Newsletter, COUNTERPUNCH. .

 

Articles about the behaviour of the British Royal Family, Her Majesty's Government, Church, Police, and Social System, seen through the eyes of a traitorous Englishman in exile.

 
rate the book

to rate this book please Register or Login

 

tags

church, government, revolution, royalty

on 2 watchlists

14 comments

 

Text Size

Text Colour

Chapters

23

report abuse

November 15, 2011

 

"This is Not the Time for Your Opinion"

Shout!

by MICHAEL DICKINSON

Last Thursday, carrying a coffee back to my tent in Parliament Square in London after my morning visit to the public toilets in Green Park for ablutions, I noticed a line of metal fences along the pavement around Westminster Abbey, and a large crowd of mostly aged people in various kinds of military attire congregating in the grounds where thousands of small wooden crosses bearing names and red paper poppies had been planted in the mown lawn, a Field of Remembrance to commemorate those who died fighting in wars for their country. I learned from one of the numerous luminous-lemon-jacketed policemen that the Queen’s husband, Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh, was about to arrive to lay a cross of his own. Deciding to wait among the smallish crowd of mostly curious camera-weilding tourists to witness the event, I noticed a strange curved shape among the plywood Poppy Factory crosses a young Chinese woman was selling from a tray at the gate, and she showed it to me. It was in the shape of a Muslim crescent, minus poppy. She also showed me other shapes – one in a Jewish star, one like an hourglass for Sikhs, and one like a lollipop stick for ‘No Faith’.

Police started to move people away from the Abbey so I went over the road to Parliament Square where I got a good view of the arrival of the Duke in his insignia-crested Rolls and his greeting of the clerics and dignitaries. Then it was the two minute silence to remember the war dead. Traffic came to a halt and the air was pregnant with silence. Suddenly a trembling indignation came over me. I felt that silence was an inappropriate way to commemorate those gassed, maimed, crippled, killed, and driven mad by armed conflict, both in the past and today. Instead I felt like shouting “No More War!” at the top of my voice. But I didn’t. I was afraid that I might swiftly find myself in police custody on a charge of ‘breach of the peace’. The silence ended, the chatting began again and the traffic resumed its incessant roar. I had missed my chance. Disappointed at my funk, I went back to my tent and finished my coffee in a pensive mood. I still had another chance. The official Day of Armistice was on the morrow, the eleventh day of the eleventh month of 2011, and the 2 minute silence would begin at 11am at the Cenotaph in Whitehall.

Next morning as the hour approached I walked along the Victoria Embankment next to the Thames, and came into Whitehall from the direction of Trafalgar Square. I couldn’t have cut it finer. There was quite a crowd standing to attention around the cenotaph memorial and the last post was being sounded by a bugler prior to Big Ben’s striking of the eleventh hour signalling the beginning of the 2 minute silence. I got as near as I could and stopped about twenty yards from a quartet of lemon jacketed policemen. One of them stared at me intently as though he knew I was going to do something. Looking behind me I saw a group of uniformed soldiers standing to attention. Running away would be useless. I decided to play it cool. The bell gonged eleven times and the silence began. I counted ten slowly and then opened my mouth and shouted at the top of my voice in the direction of the cenotaph.

“NO MORE WAR!”

Several heads in the crowd turned. I shouted again.

“NO MORE WAR!”

I wanted to say it three times, but I was suddenly approached swiftly by the policemen.

“You are entitled to your opinion,” said one, “But this is not the time or place.”

I turned and walked away past the soldiers and up towards Trafalgar Square, free, feeling quite proud of myself. No newspaper reported the incident.

On Sunday morning I was awoken by a dog sniffing outside my tent. I looked out and found it was on a lead held by a young policewoman who explained that they were doing a security check in the area before the Remembrance Day Ceremony at the Cenotaph in Whitehall. Another one? But this was the special one, to be attended by Her Majesty and the Royal Family, the Prime Minister and Military Dignities. I thanked her for the information and she went on her way with the sniffing white labrador (named Sunny). “So,” I asked myself, as I sat on the kerb of the fenced-off lawn watching the crowds in civilian and army dress arriving for the ceremony, all with poppies pinned to their breasts, while a policeman crawled inside my tent and rummaged for bombs, “Are you going to do the shout again?” Definitely! (I had just been reading about the sale of arms to Israel by UK warmongerers.) And this time I would do shout three times. But where? There was a lot of people around. I’d be safe doing it in St James’ Park but felt the sound not might reach the cenotaph. I went for a walk along the Embankment parallel to Whitehall but there were too many police vans parked along it. I decided to go back to Parliament Square.

Big Ben was just striking when I reached my tent. People were already standing to attention in the traffickless street. The last gong sounded. I counted slowly up to ten and then raised my hands to the sides of my mouth and cupped them.

“NO MORE WAR!” I bellowed three times, with a brief pause in between. Then I crawled into my tent and lay down. It was dead quiet for a while, and then a policewoman peered into the opening. She said there had been a complaint, and could I explain my action. I said that I had been speaking for those killed in armed conflict, and that God had told me to do it. Another couple of policemen arrived and they told me to come out. I did so and was tightly handcuffed behind my back and escorted across the road into the grounds of the Houses of Parliament where we waited for thirty minutes behind the black bars of the gate for a police van to arrive. A passing politician coming in from the ceremony glared at me and snorted “Disrespect for the dead!”

“It wasn’t disrespect!” I replied indignantly, unheeded.

The van arrived and I was bundled into the little cell cage at the back. The two plastic seats had recently been washed and were still wet, and I perched precariously on the edge of one as we wheeled through the streets across town to Marylebone Police Station. There the handcuffs were removed and I was also relieved of my shoes and trousers (both having strings for tying which could be used for hanging myself). Instead they gave me a pair of long johns and canvas slip-on shoes to wear, and after having the inside of my mouth swabbed for a DNA sample, my fingerprints and mugshots taken, I was shown to a cell. A policewoman gave me a cup of tea and a chicken supreme and rice packed lunch that she had heated in a microwave oven. After I’d eaten I lay and waited for the arrival of a lawyer from Biden’s Solicitors, who help people arrested in political demonstrations.

When she arrived we talked in the room before the taped interview to be conducted by detectives. She advised me to say “No Comment” to most questions when asked, but I found this difficult and generally replied honestly and straightforwardly to what was put. The officers said that I might be charged with a Public Order crime or for demonstrating without permission. They withdrew for discussion and I was returned to my cell. When they let me out an hour or so later I was informed that I was being charged with ‘use of threatening, abusive or insulting words/disorderly within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby CONTRARY TO SECTION 5 (1) AND (6) OF THE PUBLIC ORDER ACT 1986.

I am due to appear in Westminster Magistrates Court at 181 Marylebone Road on 23rd of November at 10 am. In the meantime, on condition of bail I must sign in every day at a police station in Charing Cross in case I fail to surrender to custody. However, I have decided to attend the hearing on the prescribed day and I will stick to the answer I gave the police when they read me the charge. “In my opinion I was not threatening, abusive or insulting.”

It is we, the people, who are under threat from the military machine.

“NO MORE WAR!”

 

Chapters

23

report abuse

To leave comments on this or any book please Register or Login

subscribe to comments for this book
CATHERINE SHAW wrote 152 days ago

Another one starred. I love your work

Cathy

bannism4 wrote 815 days ago

I stumbled across this Michael. It is too good for this site. Nuff said.

zap wrote 1246 days ago

hi michael, I enjoyed your frank voice and Hyde Park Corner approach. There are some juicy details here and your call for change is clearly written between the lines. Polished writing. Backed.

Francesco wrote 1256 days ago

BRILLIANT!!!!
The world is about perspective.
BACKED!!!!!!

Andrew W. wrote 1260 days ago

Home Thoughts From Aboard

Hi Michael,

I've read a couple of yours, Judas and Mother Teresa, great writing, very polished, what you would expect from a professional, you clearly don't have the time to visit this site often enough to get your work the further exposure it deserves, in fact with quotes from the Guardian etc. I wonder why you are using this site at all apart from the promote your excellent work. Really interesting stuff here, not only a great writer but you have a lovely slantways views on life, an observational and reflective locus that enables us to get inside familiar issues from an unfamiliar angle.

Well done, will back this and will do everything I can to promote your work. Your help with SL in this month of December would be very welcome.

Best wishes and good luck
Andrew W
(Sanctuary's Loss)

Jack Stirling wrote 1261 days ago

Being an expat I backed your book before reading it. I have been up to my ears with work and also completing Blindfold which is now here in all its beauty!!! Please give it a glance if you find time.

marion wrote 1487 days ago

You are too clever for comfort. Of course you know your prose is excellent easy and capitvating to read...historical facts thrown in at the right moment are interesting and provide one of the many records of a day millions watched enjoyed approved of.
I dont want to give my views on any of the political content I dont feel this is an appropriate platform. I would guess that reading my profile you would know the likely stance i would take. anyway.
So my thoughts are on your writing skills which are soo practised professional and provocative. very well written. Marion

Michael Dickinson wrote 1823 days ago

I spent the afternoon compiling this article, trying to get it finished before going in to teach a class I had unexpectedly been called in for this evening.

When i got back tonight there were 3 comments from readers in my inbox, so I discovered that Counterpunch had published it. It was a rewarding feeling.

The story is terrifying.
http://www.counterpunch.org/dickinson05282008.html

Michael Dickinson wrote 1833 days ago

Apology accepted.

But the existence of an enormously privileged, fabulously wealthy, so-called 'royal' family, who consider themselves superior to other human beings, who are saluted as 'majesties' and eat off gold plates while many of their 'subjects' starve, is something I will not accept.

cutley wrote 1833 days ago

Sorry, Michael, perhaps I was a little brusque. I apologise.

Michael Dickinson wrote 1834 days ago

Arise, Sir Cutley!

cutley wrote 1834 days ago

How odd that anyone can be this worked up about the royal family.

Michael Dickinson wrote 1835 days ago

Remembering Princess Diana
Who's Cheating?
By MICHAEL DICKINSON

There must have been more than a few who suddenly stiffened at the opening words of the Bishop of London, Right Reverend Dr Richard Chartres, when he took the pulpit to address the congregation gathered in the Guard's Chapel near Buckingham Palace, to celebrate the 10th anniversary of Princess Diana's death.

For several long moments he stood there, his head bowed in silence, before he looked up and asked a simple direct question.

"Who's cheating?"

Again he paused, uncomfortably long for several members of the royal family and invited guests to ask themselves if he could possibly be talking about them. They would have wiped the metaphorical sweat from their brow and breathed a sigh of relief as the Bishop continued.

"Those were the words of Princess Diana to a pair of elderly inmates playing a game of Beggar My Neighbour' at an old folk's home which she was visiting. How they all laughed."

His question was not a challenge to the morals of the congregation, but merely a reminder of the natural fun and spontaneity of the princess and her intuitive rapport with members of the public, which he went on to eulogize. But still, his first stark question seemed to linger in the air like a bad smell, stronger than the perfume of the profusion of English roses that decked the chapel.

"Who's cheating?" Who's playing around? Who's being unfaithful to their wedding vows? Who's having an extra-marital affair? Who is committing adultery?

Many eyes may have shifted for a moment from the pontificating priest in the pulpit to ponder uncomfortably on the backs of the heads of three of the most important guests in the front pew Queen Elizabeth, the Duke of Edinburgh, and their son, the Prince of Wales. How had the question affected them?

At least Elizabeth could not accuse herself, her fidelity unquestioned, (or was there more to her close relationship with Lord Porchester in the fifties and sixties than a shared passion for racing, and Prince Andrew the result?); but she may have reflected sadly on her role as a world-famous cuckquean, cheated on countless times in the past by the sour-faced old man sitting next to her, the man she used to call "my viking prince".

Apart from a long term affair with the Queen's cousin, Princess Alexandra, Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh, was a well-known womaniser in his hey-day, with a string of affairs with polo wives, duchesses, countesses, and several famous actresses, including, it is alleged, Jane Russell, Zsa Zsa Gabor, and Shirley MacLaine. Yet this was the man who wrote to his daughter-in-law Diana calling her a "harlot and a trollop", telling her that she should put up with his son's long running affair with Camilla Parker Bowles.

Yes, to the lugubrious-faced son, sitting next to the Duke on the front pew at the service in memory of his ex-wife, the question, "Who's cheating?" must have rung most accusingly. If he had abandoned mistress Camilla after the fairy-tale wedding to his adoring virgin bride Diana, and remained faithful to her alone, then there would have been none of the scandalous mire of events that led Diana to her conducting her own extra-marital affairs, most notably with red-haired cavalry officer James Hewitt (rumoured to be Prince Harry's real father), and eventually to her tragic untimely death in the Paris car crash with her latest amour, Harrod's heir Dodi al-Fayed.

But Charles admitted in a television interview in 1994 that he had never loved Diana, and that during the marriage he had been carrying on an affair with Mrs Parker Bowles, who he had originally met at a polo match may years before.

"There were three of us in this marriage, so it was a bit crowded," a teary eyed Diana explained for the break up with Charles in her own retaliatory TV interview.

The place next to Charles on the front pew at the memorial service was conspicuously empty. His now wife, Her Royal Majesty, Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, although invited by her stepsons, had decided it more appropriate that she not attend, saying that she feared her presence would detract from what should be a celebration of Diana's life. Instead, the woman whom Diana called "the Rottweiler" watched the service on television alone at her country home. Next week she plans to jet off without her husband for a holiday in the Meditteranean with a small group of girlfriends.

Camilla had originally intended to be there at her husband's side, and is said to be furious at having been pressured by royal aides to decline, but perhaps it's just as well she wasn't.

Although a strong-minded woman, perhaps she too might have quailed and trembled at the Bishop of London's sudden question from the pulpit. An accusation from beyond the grave from the ex-wife of the man she had secretly committed adultery with, and caused such pain and misery:

"Who's cheating?"

Michael Dickinson wrote 1835 days ago

Fuch Faschism!!!!

1